<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; Category: Legal Periodicals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/category-legal-periodicals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: Adult Entertainment And Zoning: A Starting Point For Adopting Or Updating Adult Business Ordinances</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/05/11/legal-periodical-adult-entertainment-and-zoning-a-starting-point-for-adopting-or-updating-adult-business-ordinances/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/05/11/legal-periodical-adult-entertainment-and-zoning-a-starting-point-for-adopting-or-updating-adult-business-ordinances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 17:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 10th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kansas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Teresa L. Watson, <em>Adult Entertainment And Zoning: A Starting Point For Adopting Or Updating Adult Business Ordinances</em>, 80-APR J. Kan. B.A. 30 (Apr. 2011)</strong>

<em>(An excerpt is below. To view the full text, please use Westlaw, Lexis, a law library or alternative source.)</em>

"This article summarizes the law as it pertains to the regulation of adult businesses. Part II provides some background regarding relevant Kansas statutes. Part III explores U.S. Supreme Court precedents interpreting the constitutional requirements for the regulation of adult businesses. Finally, Part IV reveals how the constitutional requirements have been interpreted and applied by the Tenth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/05/11/legal-periodical-adult-entertainment-and-zoning-a-starting-point-for-adopting-or-updating-adult-business-ordinances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Review: How the state can prevent unintended consequences in punishing sexting by minors</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/12/15/law-review-how-the-state-can-prevent-unintended-consequences-in-punishing-sexting-by-minors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/12/15/law-review-how-the-state-can-prevent-unintended-consequences-in-punishing-sexting-by-minors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (Porn): Minors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sexting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Minors and young adults who engage in sexting face serious, and often unanticipated, psychological and reputational consequences. While the current state response to sexting between minors and between young adults is inappropriate, the state can intervene in several innovative ways to educate minors and young adults about the consequences of primary and secondary sexting, impose appropriate penalties on minors who engage in primary and secondary sexting, and recognize and support appropriate remedies for minors and young adults who are victims of secondary sexting."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/12/15/law-review-how-the-state-can-prevent-unintended-consequences-in-punishing-sexting-by-minors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: Sensible Legal Approaches to Teenagers&#8217; Exchange of Self-Produced Pornography</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/11/19/legal-periodical-sensible-legal-approaches-to-teenagers-exchange-of-self-produced-pornography/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/11/19/legal-periodical-sensible-legal-approaches-to-teenagers-exchange-of-self-produced-pornography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sexting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><a href="http://www.btlj.org/data/articles/25_1/0555-0596%20Eraker_Web.pdf">Stemming Sexting: Sensible Legal Approaches to Teenagers’ Exchange of Self-Produced Pornography</a></em>
Elizabeth C. Eraker, 25 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 555 (2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/11/19/legal-periodical-sensible-legal-approaches-to-teenagers-exchange-of-self-produced-pornography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: Evaluating the Government Interest Behind Broadcast Indecency Regulation</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/11/09/legal-periodical-evaluating-the-government-interest-behind-broadcast-indecency-regulation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/11/09/legal-periodical-evaluating-the-government-interest-behind-broadcast-indecency-regulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 21:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Indecency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Minors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>The Bogeyman of “Harm to Children”: Evaluating the Government Interest Behind Broadcast Indecency Regulation</em>
Jessica C. Collins, 85 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1225 (2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/11/09/legal-periodical-evaluating-the-government-interest-behind-broadcast-indecency-regulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Periodical: Comparative Legal Approaches to Pornographic Obscenity by the United States and the United Kingdom</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/11/01/legal-periodical-comparative-legal-approaches-to-pornographic-obscenity-by-the-united-states-and-the-united-kingdom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/11/01/legal-periodical-comparative-legal-approaches-to-pornographic-obscenity-by-the-united-states-and-the-united-kingdom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 21:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Community Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Obscenity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Two Nations, One Web: Comparative Legal Approaches to Pornographic Obscenity by the United States and the United Kingdom</em>
William T. Goldberg, 90 B.U. L. Rev. 2121 (2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/11/01/legal-periodical-comparative-legal-approaches-to-pornographic-obscenity-by-the-united-states-and-the-united-kingdom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Review: Alternatives for Adult Uses Required When Town is Sued</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/26/law-review-alternatives-for-adult-uses-required-when-town-is-sued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/26/law-review-alternatives-for-adult-uses-required-when-town-is-sued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 22:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Alternative Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: TJS of New York v Town of Smithtown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Alternatives for Adult Uses Required When Town is Sued</em>
Anthony S. Guardino, 5/26/2010 N.Y.L.J. 5, (col. 2)

"The particular issue in TJS was whether the constitutionality of a zoning ordinance should only be evaluated with regard to the ‘alternative avenues of communication‘ the ordinance left open at the time it was passed, or those it left open at the time it was challenged."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/26/law-review-alternatives-for-adult-uses-required-when-town-is-sued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Review: Madisonian Pornography Or, The Importance of Jeffrey Sherman</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/08/law-review-madisonian-pornography-or-the-importance-of-jeffrey-sherman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/08/law-review-madisonian-pornography-or-the-importance-of-jeffrey-sherman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I will begin with the fundamentals of free speech theory. Why is there free speech protection at all? I will describe the classic answer to this question developed by James Madison. Then I will rebut the narrow construction of Madison's argument that was once proffered by Robert Bork. I will show why Madison's argument reaches toward, but does not fully defend, a right to pornography. Then I will show why Sherman's work completes the Madisonian argument."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/08/law-review-madisonian-pornography-or-the-importance-of-jeffrey-sherman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Review: Internet Child Protection Registry Acts: Protecting Children, Parents and . . . Pornographers? Allowing States to Balance the First Amendment with Parents&#8217; Rights to Privacy and Sovereignty in the Home</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/18/law-review-internet-child-protection-registry-acts-protecting-children-parents-and-pornographers-allowing-states-to-balance-the-first-amendment-with-parents-rights-to-privacy-and-sovereign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/18/law-review-internet-child-protection-registry-acts-protecting-children-parents-and-pornographers-allowing-states-to-balance-the-first-amendment-with-parents-rights-to-privacy-and-sovereign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Internet Child Protection Registry Acts: Protecting Children, Parents and . . . Pornographers? Allowing States to Balance the First Amendment with Parents' Rights to Privacy and Sovereignty in the Home</em>
Samuel D. Castor, 59 Cath. U. L. Rev. 231 (2009)

"This Comment evaluates states' role in the tug-of-war between governments attempting to help parents protect children from unwanted, and potentially harmful, electronic communications and the First Amendment, which prohibits Congress from abridging a person's freedom of speech."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/18/law-review-internet-child-protection-registry-acts-protecting-children-parents-and-pornographers-allowing-states-to-balance-the-first-amendment-with-parents-rights-to-privacy-and-sovereign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Review: Creating a Legal Remedy for Victims of Porn 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/16/law-review-creating-a-legal-remedy-for-victims-of-porn-2-0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/16/law-review-creating-a-legal-remedy-for-victims-of-porn-2-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Restitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><em>Sex, Privacy, and Webpages: Creating a Legal Remedy for Victims of Porn 2.0</em>
Ariel Ronneburger, 21 Syracuse Sci. &#38; Tech. L. Rep. 1 (2009)</strong>

"This paper addresses this problem by proposing an amendment to the CDA, creating potential liability for service providers who fail to at least investigate claims of non-consented pornography."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/16/law-review-creating-a-legal-remedy-for-victims-of-porn-2-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Review: Solutions to the Legal Dilemma Caused by Sexting</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/29/law-review-solutions-to-the-legal-dilemma-caused-by-sexting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/29/law-review-solutions-to-the-legal-dilemma-caused-by-sexting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sentencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sexting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Average Teenager or Sex Offender? Solutions to the Legal Dilemma Caused by Sexting</em>
Shannon Shafron-Perez, 26 J. Marshall J. Computer &#38; Info. L. 431 (2009)

"This Comment broadly considers the failure of the law to adapt to developments in technology and communication, untangles the different approaches taken by a sample of states, and considers which legal remedy is most appropriate."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/29/law-review-solutions-to-the-legal-dilemma-caused-by-sexting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

