11th Circuit upholds Spalding Co., Ga. restrictions on nudity and alcohol licensing

Curves v. Spalding County, Ga, No. 10-13871 (11th Cir. July 6, 2012)

11th Circuit asked to reinstate $19.6 million award against Hustler

First Amendment Center: The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in June 2009 that a notorious death doesn’t give publishers a blank check to publish any images they wish. The case went to trial, and a jury in June 2011 voted to slap Hustler Magazine with $19.6 million in punitive damages for running the photos.

11th Cir. Panel: Minor girls in ‘Wild’ video to remain anonymous

AP: “A federal appeals court has ruled that two underage girls can keep their names under wraps in their lawsuit against “Girls Gone Wild” producer Joe Francis.” | Plaintiff B v. Francis, No. 10-10664 (11th Cir. Feb. 1, 2011)

February 1, 2011 | Comments Off  Tags: , ,

11th Circuit upholds Manatee County, Fla. SOB ordinance

Peek-a-Boo Lounge of Bradenton v. Manatee County, Fla, No. 09-16438., 2011 WL 182819 (11th Cir. Jan. 21, 2011)

Split en banc 11th Circuit rules child molester’s 17½-year sentence substantively unreasonable

U.S. v. Irey, No. 08-10997 (11th Cir. July 29, 2010)

11th Circuit: Residence used for recording sexual activity to broadcast on the Internet properly regulated as business

FlavaWorks, Inc., v. City of Miami, No. 09-11264, 609 F.3d 1233 (11th Cir. June 25, 2010)

Residence used for recording sexual activity to broadcast on the Internet was not properly regulated as an “adult businesses” but was properly regulated as a business.

Should the obscenity standard for internet speech be national, or local?

FindLaw: “Obscenity law has always had weak underpinnings. Now, due to the advent of the Internet, it may be toppled entirely, if courts truly begin to take seriously the due process and First Amendment problems it raises. If it is not toppled, then significant injustices – like the injustice perpetrated in the Paul Little case – will only continue.”

11th Circuit: County studies documenting negative secondary effects are sufficient for prohibition of alcohol at sexually oriented businesses

Flanigan’s Enterprises, Inc. v. Fulton County, Ga., No. 08-17035 (11th Cir., Feb. 16, 2010)

11th Circuit: County studies documenting negative secondary effects are sufficient for prohibition of alcohol at sexually oriented businesses.

Eleventh Circuit Rejects Ninth Circuit’s National-Standard-for-Internet-Obscenity Decision

Eugene Volokh reports: “United States v. Little concludes that Internet obscenity distribution prosecutions may rely on the community standard of the place in which the material was distributed — which means the government can try to download the material in the most restrictive community, and prosecute the distributor there. This may well be correct, given the Court’s decision in Ashcroft v. ACLU (I); and the Ninth Circuit’s contrary decision in United States v. Kilbride might well be mistaken . . . “

Law Review: Why the 5th Circuit is Correct About Lawrence

Satisfying Lawrence: The Fifth Circuit Strikes Ban on Sex Toy Sales
Jamie Iguchi, 43 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 655 (2009)

“At its core, the disagreement between the circuits turns on the scope of the right announced in Lawrence and the standard of review it requires.”

Next Page →