http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/01/10/u-s-supreme-court-considers-fcc-indecency-enforcement-authority/ http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/01/10/u-s-supreme-court-considers-fcc-indecency-enforcement-authority/#comments Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:21:58 +0000 admin http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2660 FCC v. Fox Television Stations, No. 10-1293. The question considered: Whether the Federal Communications Commission's current indecency-enforcement regime violates the First or Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. (Sotomayor, J., recused). Court filings in the litigation can be found at SCOTUS Blog. Links to Related media reports discussing the litigation can be found here. ]]> http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/01/10/u-s-supreme-court-considers-fcc-indecency-enforcement-authority/feed/ 0 http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/11/28/supreme-court-refuses-to-resolve-confusion-over-child-pornography-law/ http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/11/28/supreme-court-refuses-to-resolve-confusion-over-child-pornography-law/#comments Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:08:55 +0000 admin http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2656 Amy v. Monzel (11-85). ]]> http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/11/28/supreme-court-refuses-to-resolve-confusion-over-child-pornography-law/feed/ 0 http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/11/28/supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-alameda-books-sexually-oriented-businesses-case/ http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/11/28/supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-alameda-books-sexually-oriented-businesses-case/#comments Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:16:58 +0000 admin http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2647 refused to hear Los Angeles v. Alameda Books Nos. 11-245, 11-379. Document related to that litigation, the 9th Circuit opinion, and a summary of the issues involved can be found at SCOTUS Blog here.]]> http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/11/28/supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-alameda-books-sexually-oriented-businesses-case/feed/ 0 http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/11/22/supreme-court-asked-to-revisit-city-of-los-angeles-v-alameda-books-inc-concerning-regulation-of-sexually-oriented-businesses/ http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/11/22/supreme-court-asked-to-revisit-city-of-los-angeles-v-alameda-books-inc-concerning-regulation-of-sexually-oriented-businesses/#comments Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:42:14 +0000 admin http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2643 SCOTUSblog reports that City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc. is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court again. ]]> http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/11/22/supreme-court-asked-to-revisit-city-of-los-angeles-v-alameda-books-inc-concerning-regulation-of-sexually-oriented-businesses/feed/ 0