<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; Effects (SOB)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/effects-sob/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit upholds Manatee County, Fla. SOB ordinance</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/02/01/11th-circuit-upholds-manatee-county-fla-sob-ordinance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/02/01/11th-circuit-upholds-manatee-county-fla-sob-ordinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Peek-a-Boo Lounge of Bradenton v. Manatee County Fla.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200916438.pdf"><em>Peek-a-Boo Lounge of Bradenton v. Manatee County, Fla</em></a>, No. 09-16438., 2011 WL 182819 (11th Cir. Jan. 21, 2011)
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/02/01/11th-circuit-upholds-manatee-county-fla-sob-ordinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PA: When defining adult businesses, local municipalities cross into hot territory</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/01/20/pa-when-defining-adult-businesses-local-municipalities-cross-into-hot-territory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/01/20/pa-when-defining-adult-businesses-local-municipalities-cross-into-hot-territory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Pennsylvania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Earlier this month, Derry Township officials found themselves considering a legal challenge when the owner of Shane’s City Limits sought to revive his business by having scantily-clad dancers shimmy for customers several nights a week . . . The Shane's incident was unusual not only because of the novelty . . . but because cases involving adult establishments have quieted in the past decade."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/01/20/pa-when-defining-adult-businesses-local-municipalities-cross-into-hot-territory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TX: Airport steaming over strip club neighbor</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/01/06/tx-airport-steaming-over-strip-club-neighbor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/01/06/tx-airport-steaming-over-strip-club-neighbor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["A new Rick’s Cabaret is about to open near the South entrance to DFW International Airport . . . The new strip club is trying to get a liquor license from the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission. Prominent Tarrant County leaders, including County Judge Glen Whitley, are protesting the permit."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/01/06/tx-airport-steaming-over-strip-club-neighbor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pittsburgh loses appeal of strip club approval</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/12/30/pittsburgh-loses-appeal-of-strip-club-approval/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/12/30/pittsburgh-loses-appeal-of-strip-club-approval/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Marquise Investment v. City of Pittsburgh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><a href="http://www.aopc.org/OpPosting/Cwealth/out/2507CD09_12-30-10.pdf">Marquise Investment, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh</a></em>, No. 2507 C.D. 2009 (Dec. 30, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/12/30/pittsburgh-loses-appeal-of-strip-club-approval/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ariz. strip club shooting leaves 2 dead, 2 wounded</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/12/28/ariz-strip-club-shooting-leaves-2-dead-2-wounded/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/12/28/ariz-strip-club-shooting-leaves-2-dead-2-wounded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["A man started shooting inside a strip club, killing two people and wounding two others, including a topless dancer, before patrons wrestled the gunman to the floor, police said Monday."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/12/28/ariz-strip-club-shooting-leaves-2-dead-2-wounded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WI: Adult entertainment district designated in Spooner</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/03/wi-adult-entertainment-district-designated-in-spooner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/03/wi-adult-entertainment-district-designated-in-spooner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wcregister.net/default.asp?sourceid=&#038;smenu=73&#038;twindow=&#038;mad=&#038;sdetail=7063&#038;wpage=1&#038;skeyword=&#038;sidate=&#038;ccat=&#038;ccatm=&#038;restate=&#038;restatus=&#038;reoption=&#038;retype=&#038;repmin=&#038;repmax=&#038;rebed=&#038;rebath=&#038;subname=&#038;pform=&#038;sc=1142&#038;hn=wcregister&#038;he=.net">Washburn County Register</a>: "The city ordinance prevents liquor-licensed establishments, with the exception of performance arts centers, from having nudity or acts simulating sex, citing potential secondary effects such as prostitution and crime. Olson was told this prohibited his establishment, Moe’s Place, from having topless dancers, so he began having dancers wearing bikinis instead."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/03/wi-adult-entertainment-district-designated-in-spooner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MA: Lund’s strip club lawsuit moved to federal court</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/26/ma-lund%e2%80%99s-strip-club-lawsuit-moved-to-federal-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/26/ma-lund%e2%80%99s-strip-club-lawsuit-moved-to-federal-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wickedlocal.com/somerset/news/x1595500582/Lund-s-strip-club-lawsuit-moved-to-federal-court">Herald News</a>: "The lawsuit filed two weeks ago by Gary Lund alleging the city has unconstitutionally prohibited adult entertainment was remanded to U.S. District Court in Boston this week at the city’s request."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/26/ma-lund%e2%80%99s-strip-club-lawsuit-moved-to-federal-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit: County studies documenting negative secondary effects are sufficient for prohibition of alcohol at sexually oriented businesses</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/16/11th-circuit-county-studies-documenting-negative-secondary-effects-are-sufficient-for-prohibition-of-alcohol-at-sexually-oriented-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/16/11th-circuit-county-studies-documenting-negative-secondary-effects-are-sufficient-for-prohibition-of-alcohol-at-sexually-oriented-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Flanigan's Enterprises Inc v Fulton County Ga]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200817035.pdf"><em>Flanigan’s  Enterprises, Inc. v. Fulton County, Ga.</em></a>, No. 08-17035 (11th  Cir., Feb. 16, 2010)

11th Circuit: County studies documenting negative secondary effects are sufficient for prohibition of alcohol at sexually oriented businesses.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/16/11th-circuit-county-studies-documenting-negative-secondary-effects-are-sufficient-for-prohibition-of-alcohol-at-sexually-oriented-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New prostitution law cuts into business at RI strip clubs</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/14/new-prostitution-law-cuts-into-business-at-ri-strip-clubs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/14/new-prostitution-law-cuts-into-business-at-ri-strip-clubs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prostitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Bouncers patrol dimly lit alcoves where topless women socialize with customers. The curtains that offered a measure of privacy in the 'VIP rooms' are gone. And signs posted throughout the Charles Street club read: 'Prostitution is illegal.'"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/14/new-prostitution-law-cuts-into-business-at-ri-strip-clubs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>S.D. Ind. preliminary injunction denied where regulation not likely to decrease secondary effects</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/02/s-d-ind-preliminary-injunction-denied-where-regulation-not-likely-to-decrease-secondary-effects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/02/s-d-ind-preliminary-injunction-denied-where-regulation-not-likely-to-decrease-secondary-effects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Annex Books Inc v City of Indianapolis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cases/20091202.pdf"><em>Annex Books, Inc. v. City of Indianapoli</em>s</a>, No. 1:03-cv-918-SEB-TAB, 2009 WL 4639715 (S.D. Ind. Dec. 2, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/02/s-d-ind-preliminary-injunction-denied-where-regulation-not-likely-to-decrease-secondary-effects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

