<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; Regulation (SOB): Definitions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/regulation-sob-definitions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Iowa Court of Appeals OKs strip club ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/12/iowa-court-of-appeals-oks-strip-club-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/12/iowa-court-of-appeals-oks-strip-club-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Double Jeopardy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ketv.com/news/22528084/detail.html">KETV</a>: "The Iowa Court of Appeals will allow dancers to continue to perform at a controversial strip club."

<a href="http://www.iowacourts.gov/court_of_appeals/Recent_Opinions/20100210/9-587.pdf"><em>Iowa v. Judy</em></a>, No. 9-587 / 08-1430 (Iowa App. Feb. 10, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/12/iowa-court-of-appeals-oks-strip-club-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit upholds &#8220;adult oriented&#8221; definition as applied to store with 12% &#8220;adult item&#8221; inventory</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/25/2nd-circuit-upholds-adult-oriented-definition-as-applied-to-store-with-12-adult-item-inventory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/25/2nd-circuit-upholds-adult-oriented-definition-as-applied-to-store-with-12-adult-item-inventory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Connecticut]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/23959bb1-78f8-4462-bf9a-1d40a9ff44fe/1/doc/09-2950-cv_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/23959bb1-78f8-4462-bf9a-1d40a9ff44fe/1/hilite/"><em>VIP of Berlin v. Town of Berlin</em></a>, No. 09-2950-cv (2nd Cir. Jan. 25, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/25/2nd-circuit-upholds-adult-oriented-definition-as-applied-to-store-with-12-adult-item-inventory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit: Definitions of &#8216;adult cabaret,&#8217; &#8216;adult-oriented establishment,&#8217; and &#8216;adult entertainment&#8217; in Tennessee&#8217;s Adult-Oriented Establishment Registration Act are upheld along with &#8220;no-touch&#8221; restrictions</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/25/6th-circuit-definitions-of-adult-cabaret-adult-oriented-establishment-and-adult-entertainment-in-tennessees-adult-oriented-establishment-registration-act-are-upheld-along-with-no-to/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/25/6th-circuit-definitions-of-adult-cabaret-adult-oriented-establishment-and-adult-entertainment-in-tennessees-adult-oriented-establishment-registration-act-are-upheld-along-with-no-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Distance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): No-Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Entertainment Productions v Shelby County Tenn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><a href="http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/09a0406p-06.pdf" target="_blank">Entertainment Productions v. Shelby County, Tenn.</a></em>, 588 F.3d 372, TN 588 F.3d 372 (6th Cir. Nov. 25, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/25/6th-circuit-definitions-of-adult-cabaret-adult-oriented-establishment-and-adult-entertainment-in-tennessees-adult-oriented-establishment-registration-act-are-upheld-along-with-no-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit validates &#8220;secondary effects&#8221; evidence, upholds Knox County SOB ordinance</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/02/12/6th-circuit-validates-secondary-effects-evidence-upholds-knox-county-sob-ordinance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/02/12/6th-circuit-validates-secondary-effects-evidence-upholds-knox-county-sob-ordinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Ordinances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Distance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): No-Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Off-Site Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Tennessee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Sixth Circuit panel upheld Knox County’s comprehensive (licensing, midnight closure, no alcohol, no nudity, 6-ft, no-touch, etc.) sexually oriented business (SOB) ordinance against a four-part challenge.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/02/12/6th-circuit-validates-secondary-effects-evidence-upholds-knox-county-sob-ordinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court upholds Knox County SOB regulations</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2007/12/17/federal-court-upholds-knox-county-sob-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2007/12/17/federal-court-upholds-knox-county-sob-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Richland Bookmart Inc v Knox County]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Richland Bookmart, Inc. v. Knox County</em>, 529 F.Supp.2d 868, 2007 WL 4480138 (E.D.Tenn.; Dec. 17, 2007)

Knox County SOB regulations (including hours-of-operation, alcohol sales prohibition, and denial of licensing to criminals convicted of sexual crimes) are found constitutional.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2007/12/17/federal-court-upholds-knox-county-sob-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

