Filed Under Category Case Abstracts, News by admin
Ocello v. Koster, No. SC91563 (Mo. Nov. 15, 2011)
The law prohibits totally nude dancing and any contact between dancers and patrons. It prohibits the sale of alcohol at such businesses and requires that they close at midnight. It restricts enclosed booths to discourage promiscuous sexual activity. It requires that any such businesses be located at least 1000 feet from any school, church, day care center, public park, any residence, or any other sexually oriented business.
Filed Under Category Case Abstracts by admin
E.B.S. Enterprises v. City of El Paso, No. 8-10-00088-CV (Tx. Ct. App. Aug. 10, 2011)
Appellants assert three arguments in contending that the trial court erred in granting the City’s motion for summary judgment. The first contests the relevancy of the City’s secondary effects evidence to enacting four provisions of the ordinance that apply to Appellants. The second complains that there was a genuine issue of material fact. And the third asserts that the ordinance is preempted by a State statute. We find no merit in any of the issues raised . . .
Filed Under Category News by admin
CitizenLink, DriveThru: “The Supreme Court of Kentucky handed the city of Louisville a huge gift today when it decided in favor of an extensive sexually oriented business ordinance passed by the Metro Council in 2004. All but one provision was held to be constitutional.”
Filed Under Category Case Abstracts by admin
Entertainment Productions v. Shelby County, Tenn., 588 F.3d 372, TN 588 F.3d 372 (6th Cir. Nov. 25, 2009)
Filed Under Category Memos, Ordinances by admin
Read more
August 17, 2009 |
Comments Off Tags:
Category: Memos,
Category: Ordinances,
Court: 1st Circuit,
Regulation (SOB): Amortization,
Regulation (SOB): Distance,
Regulation (SOB): Interior,
Regulation (SOB): Licensing,
Regulation (SOB): No-Touch,
Regulation (SOB): Nudity,
Regulation (SOB): Time,
Regulation (SOB): Zoning
Filed Under Category Memos, Ordinances by admin
Read more
August 17, 2009 |
Comments Off Tags:
Category: Memos,
Category: Ordinances,
Court: 2nd Circuit,
Regulation (SOB): Amortization,
Regulation (SOB): Distance,
Regulation (SOB): Interior,
Regulation (SOB): Licensing,
Regulation (SOB): No-Touch,
Regulation (SOB): Nudity,
Regulation (SOB): Time,
Regulation (SOB): Zoning
Filed Under Category Memos, Ordinances by admin
Read more
August 17, 2009 |
Comments Off Tags:
Category: Memos,
Category: Ordinances,
Court: 3rd Circuit,
Regulation (SOB): Amortization,
Regulation (SOB): Distance,
Regulation (SOB): Interior,
Regulation (SOB): Licensing,
Regulation (SOB): No-Touch,
Regulation (SOB): Nudity,
Regulation (SOB): Time,
Regulation (SOB): Zoning
Filed Under Category Memos, Ordinances by admin
Read more
August 17, 2009 |
Comments Off Tags:
Category: Memos,
Category: Ordinances,
Court: 4th Circuit,
Regulation (SOB): Amortization,
Regulation (SOB): Distance,
Regulation (SOB): Interior,
Regulation (SOB): Licensing,
Regulation (SOB): No-Touch,
Regulation (SOB): Nudity,
Regulation (SOB): Time,
Regulation (SOB): Zoning
Filed Under Category Memos, Ordinances by admin
Read more
August 14, 2009 |
Comments Off Tags:
Category: Memos,
Category: Ordinances,
Court: 5th Circuit,
Regulation (SOB): Amortization,
Regulation (SOB): Distance,
Regulation (SOB): Interior,
Regulation (SOB): Licensing,
Regulation (SOB): No-Touch,
Regulation (SOB): Nudity,
Regulation (SOB): Time,
Regulation (SOB): Zoning
Filed Under Category Memos, Ordinances by admin
Read more
August 14, 2009 |
Comments Off Tags:
Category: Memos,
Category: Ordinances,
Court: 6th Circuit,
Regulation (SOB): Amortization,
Regulation (SOB): Distance,
Regulation (SOB): Interior,
Regulation (SOB): Licensing,
Regulation (SOB): No-Touch,
Regulation (SOB): Nudity,
Regulation (SOB): Time,
Regulation (SOB): Zoning Next Page →
