<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; Regulation (SOB): Nudity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/regulation-sob-nudity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Missouri Supreme Court upholds law regulating sexually oriented businesses</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/11/15/missouri-supreme-court-upholds-law-regulating-sexually-oriented-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/11/15/missouri-supreme-court-upholds-law-regulating-sexually-oriented-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Distance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Missouri]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><a href="http://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=50675">Ocello v. Koster</a></em>, No. SC91563 (Mo. Nov. 15, 2011)
The law prohibits totally nude dancing and any contact between dancers and patrons.  It prohibits the sale of alcohol at such businesses and requires that they close at midnight.  It restricts enclosed booths to discourage promiscuous sexual activity.  It requires that any such businesses be located at least 1000 feet from any school, church, day care center, public park, any residence, or any other sexually oriented business.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/11/15/missouri-supreme-court-upholds-law-regulating-sexually-oriented-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KY: Supreme Court upholds Louisville sexually oriented business ordinance</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/22/ky-supreme-court-upholds-louisville-sexually-oriented-business-ordinance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/22/ky-supreme-court-upholds-louisville-sexually-oriented-business-ordinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Distance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kentucky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://citizenlinkblog.com/drivethru/2010/04/louisville-slugger/">CitizenLink, DriveThru</a>: "The  Supreme Court of Kentucky handed the city of Louisville a huge gift today when it decided in favor of an extensive sexually oriented business ordinance passed by the Metro Council in 2004. All but one provision was held to be constitutional."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/22/ky-supreme-court-upholds-louisville-sexually-oriented-business-ordinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CA: Gilroy Council approves SOB ordinance</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/26/ca-gilroy-council-approves-sob-ordinance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/26/ca-gilroy-council-approves-sob-ordinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gilroydispatch.com/news/262667-council-approves-adult-entertainment-ordinance">Gilroy Dispatch</a>: "Gilroy's City Council on Monday unanimously approved revisions to an adult entertainment ordinance, outlawing full nudity at adult businesses among other restrictions."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/26/ca-gilroy-council-approves-sob-ordinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit: Definitions of &#8216;adult cabaret,&#8217; &#8216;adult-oriented establishment,&#8217; and &#8216;adult entertainment&#8217; in Tennessee&#8217;s Adult-Oriented Establishment Registration Act are upheld along with &#8220;no-touch&#8221; restrictions</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/25/6th-circuit-definitions-of-adult-cabaret-adult-oriented-establishment-and-adult-entertainment-in-tennessees-adult-oriented-establishment-registration-act-are-upheld-along-with-no-to/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/25/6th-circuit-definitions-of-adult-cabaret-adult-oriented-establishment-and-adult-entertainment-in-tennessees-adult-oriented-establishment-registration-act-are-upheld-along-with-no-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Distance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): No-Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Entertainment Productions v Shelby County Tenn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><a href="http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/09a0406p-06.pdf" target="_blank">Entertainment Productions v. Shelby County, Tenn.</a></em>, 588 F.3d 372, TN 588 F.3d 372 (6th Cir. Nov. 25, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/25/6th-circuit-definitions-of-adult-cabaret-adult-oriented-establishment-and-adult-entertainment-in-tennessees-adult-oriented-establishment-registration-act-are-upheld-along-with-no-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NC: Alamance strip club case settled</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/20/nc-alamance-strip-club-case-settled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/20/nc-alamance-strip-club-case-settled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prostitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Facing more than 700 charges related to prostitution, drug violations, alcohol violations, and nudity, the owner of a strip club in Alamance County has reached a settlement with the county commissioners that requires him to “cease and desist” current operations of the strip club, and prohibits future ownership, operation, or affiliation with a sexually oriented business (SOB) in the county."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/20/nc-alamance-strip-club-case-settled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Detroit: Vote on strip club ordinance may be delayed</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/13/detroit-vote-on-strip-club-ordinance-may-be-delayed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/13/detroit-vote-on-strip-club-ordinance-may-be-delayed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Michigan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["A lack of a quorum at a Detroit City Council meeting this morning may derail a scheduled vote next week on a licensing ordinance to govern strip clubs in the city."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/13/detroit-vote-on-strip-club-ordinance-may-be-delayed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.: The Naked Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/21/barnes-v-glen-theatre-inc-the-naked-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/21/barnes-v-glen-theatre-inc-the-naked-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kathleen T. Gibson, 9 U. Miami Ent. &#38; Sports L.Rev. 201 (2009)<br />
"In Barnes, the issue before the Court was whether the application of an Indiana public indecency statute to nude dancing impermissibly infringed upon freedom of speech. "
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/21/barnes-v-glen-theatre-inc-the-naked-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1st Circuit Authorities for Various SOB Ordinance Requirements</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/17/1st-circuit-authorities-for-various-sob-ordinance-requirements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/17/1st-circuit-authorities-for-various-sob-ordinance-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Memos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ordinances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Memos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Ordinances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 1st Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Amortization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Distance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Interior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): No-Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research as of June 2009 Limitations on hours of operation El Marocco Club, Inc. v. Fox, 110 F.Supp.2d 54 (D.R.I. 2000) Prohibition on nude performance City of Erie v. Pap’s A.M., 529 U.S. 277 (2000); Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560 (1991) 18-inch raised stage requirement No Decision Found. Six foot distance requirement [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/17/1st-circuit-authorities-for-various-sob-ordinance-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit Authorities for Various SOB Ordinance Requirements</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/17/2nd-circuit-authorities-for-various-sob-ordinance-requirements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/17/2nd-circuit-authorities-for-various-sob-ordinance-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Memos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ordinances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Memos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Ordinances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Amortization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Distance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Interior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): No-Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research as of June 2009 Limitations on hours of operation No Decision Found. Prohibition on nude performance City of Erie v. Pap’s A.M., 529 U.S. 277 (2000); Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560 (1991) 18-inch raised stage requirement Brownell v. City of Rochester, 190 F.Supp.2d 472 (W.D.N.Y. 2001) {Only Briefly Mentioned] Six foot [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/17/2nd-circuit-authorities-for-various-sob-ordinance-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3rd Circuit Authorities for Various SOB Ordinance Requirements</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/17/3rd-circuit-authorities-for-various-sob-ordinance-requirements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/17/3rd-circuit-authorities-for-various-sob-ordinance-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Memos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ordinances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Memos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Ordinances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 3rd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Amortization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Distance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Interior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): No-Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research as of June 2009 Limitations on hours of operation Mitchell v. Commission on Adult Entertainment Establishments of State of Del., 10 F. 3d 123 (3d Cir. 1993) Prohibition on nude performance City of Erie v. Pap’s A.M., 529 U.S. 277 (2000); Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560 (1991) 18-inch raised stage requirement [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/17/3rd-circuit-authorities-for-various-sob-ordinance-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

