<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; State: Alabama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/state-alabama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>AL: Montage containing photographs of nude child and adult genitalia is child pornography</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/06/25/al-montage-containing-photographs-of-nude-child-and-adult-genitalia-is-child-pornography/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/06/25/al-montage-containing-photographs-of-nude-child-and-adult-genitalia-is-child-pornography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: McFadden v. Alabama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>McFadden v. Alabama</em>, 2010 WL 2562269 (Ala.Crim.App., June 25, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/06/25/al-montage-containing-photographs-of-nude-child-and-adult-genitalia-is-child-pornography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>M.D. Ala.: Possession of child porn is not lesser-included offense of production</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/23/m-d-ala-possession-of-child-porn-is-not-lesser-included-offense-of-production/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/23/m-d-ala-possession-of-child-porn-is-not-lesser-included-offense-of-production/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Double Jeopardy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: US v Dean]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://ecf.almd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2008cr0065-49"><em>U.S. v. Dean</em></a>, No. 2:08cr65-MHT, 2009 WL 4023127 (M.D. Ala. Nov. 23, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/23/m-d-ala-possession-of-child-porn-is-not-lesser-included-offense-of-production/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Alabama’s criminalization of sex toys reach the Supreme Court?</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/15/will-alabama%e2%80%99s-criminalization-of-sex-toys-reach-the-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/15/will-alabama%e2%80%99s-criminalization-of-sex-toys-reach-the-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: US Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: 1568 Montgomery Highway Inc v City of Hoover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Lawrence v Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Reliable Consultants v Earle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Williams v Morgan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/20090915.pdf"><em>1568 Montgomery Highway, Inc. v. City of Hoover</em></a>, No. 1070531 (Ala. Sept. 11, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/15/will-alabama%e2%80%99s-criminalization-of-sex-toys-reach-the-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Following the 11th Circuit in Williams, Alabama court holds that public morality is a sufficient basis to uphold ban on sale of &#8220;sex toys&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/11/following-the-11th-circuit-in-williams-alabama-court-holds-that-public-morality-is-a-sufficient-basis-to-uphold-ban-on-sale-of-sex-toys/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/11/following-the-11th-circuit-in-williams-alabama-court-holds-that-public-morality-is-a-sufficient-basis-to-uphold-ban-on-sale-of-sex-toys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 5th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sex Toys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: 1568 Montgomery Highway Inc v City of Hoover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cases/20090911.pdf">1568 Montgomery Highway, Inc. v. City of Hoover</a>, (AL Sup. Ct., Sept. 11, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/11/following-the-11th-circuit-in-williams-alabama-court-holds-that-public-morality-is-a-sufficient-basis-to-uphold-ban-on-sale-of-sex-toys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alabama High Court Says Morality Can Still Justify Commercial Regulation</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/11/alabama-high-court-says-morality-can-still-justify-commercial-regulation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/11/alabama-high-court-says-morality-can-still-justify-commercial-regulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sex Toys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: 1568 Montgomery Highway Inc v City of Hoover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.alabamaappellatewatch.com/uploads/file/1070531.PDF"><em>1568 Montgomery Highway, Inc. v. City of Hoover</em></a>, (AL Sup. Ct., Sept. 11, 2009)

"In a 7-2 decision, the court upheld against constitutional attack Alabama's ban on the commercial distribution of sex toys . . . The court concluded that 'public morality' can serve as a legitimate rational basis for regulating non-private commercial activity . . ."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/11/alabama-high-court-says-morality-can-still-justify-commercial-regulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

