<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; State: Arizona</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/state-arizona/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ariz. strip club shooting leaves 2 dead, 2 wounded</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/12/28/ariz-strip-club-shooting-leaves-2-dead-2-wounded/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/12/28/ariz-strip-club-shooting-leaves-2-dead-2-wounded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["A man started shooting inside a strip club, killing two people and wounding two others, including a topless dancer, before patrons wrestled the gunman to the floor, police said Monday."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/12/28/ariz-strip-club-shooting-leaves-2-dead-2-wounded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AZ Court of Appeals: Downloading child porn constitutes &#8220;duplicating&#8221; rather than &#8220;receiving&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/30/az-court-of-appeals-downloading-child-porn-constitutes-duplicating-rather-than-receiving/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/30/az-court-of-appeals-downloading-child-porn-constitutes-duplicating-rather-than-receiving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography Production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.apltwo.ct.state.az.us/Decisions/cr20090090opn.pdf"><em>Arizona v. Windsor</em></a>, No. 2 CA-CR 2009-0090, 2010 WL 1215064 (Ariz. App. Div. 2, March 30, 2010)

Remote downloading of child pornography constitutes "duplication" rather than "receiving."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/30/az-court-of-appeals-downloading-child-porn-constitutes-duplicating-rather-than-receiving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AZ: Pinal County places new limits on sexually oriented businesses</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/26/az-pinal-county-places-new-limits-on-sexually-oriented-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/26/az-pinal-county-places-new-limits-on-sexually-oriented-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.trivalleycentral.com/articles/2010/01/26/casa_grande_dispatch/top_stories/doc4b5f17beefaba145286314.txt">TriValley Central</a>: "The Board of Supervisors unanimously approved a zoning ordinance amendment on Jan. 20 that would change the designation of adult entertainment and adult service providers to adult-oriented businesses and would require a new zoning category that would limit where they may be located."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/26/az-pinal-county-places-new-limits-on-sexually-oriented-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona Court of Appeals: Residents&#8217; personal knowledge and experience adequately supported denial of SOB use permit</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/22/az-app-residents-personal-knowledge-and-experience-adequately-supported-denial-of-sob-use-permit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/22/az-app-residents-personal-knowledge-and-experience-adequately-supported-denial-of-sob-use-permit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Economic Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Community Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Permits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Treulich's Plaza v City of Phoenix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cofad1.state.az.us/memod/CV/CV090025.pdf"><em>Treulich's Plaza, LLC v. City of Phoenix</em></a>, No. 1 CA-CV 09-0025, 2009 WL 4981478 (Ariz. App. Div. 1, Dec. 22, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/22/az-app-residents-personal-knowledge-and-experience-adequately-supported-denial-of-sob-use-permit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9th Circuit: National community standard must be applied in regulating Internet obscenity</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/28/9th-circuit-national-community-standard-must-be-applied-in-regulating-internet-obscenity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/28/9th-circuit-national-community-standard-must-be-applied-in-regulating-internet-obscenity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Community Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Obscenity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: US v Kilbride]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cases/20091028.pdf"><em>U.S. v. Kilbride</em></a>, No. 07-10528 (9th Cir., Oct 28, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/28/9th-circuit-national-community-standard-must-be-applied-in-regulating-internet-obscenity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bath photos and Wal-Mart: What is child pornography?</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/23/bath-photos-wal-mart-what-is-child-pornography/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/23/bath-photos-wal-mart-what-is-child-pornography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Articles: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/blotter/2009/09/bath-photos-wal-mart-what-is-child-pornography.html">FindLaw</a>: "An Arizona couple had to regain custody of their children after Wal-Mart employees and local authorities deemed their bath time photos child pornography. Their horror story has many wondering: what exactly constitutes child pornography?"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/23/bath-photos-wal-mart-what-is-child-pornography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1990-1997: National Law Center Summaries of &#8220;SOB Land Use&#8221; Studies</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/02/24/nlc-summaries-of-sob-land-use-studies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/02/24/nlc-summaries-of-sob-land-use-studies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Economic Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects: Quality of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Minors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crime Impact Studies by Municipal and State Governments on Harmful Secondary Effects of Sexually Oriented Businesses.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/02/24/nlc-summaries-of-sob-land-use-studies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AZ Supreme Court remands hours of operation case in light of new &#8220;secondary effects&#8221; test</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/10/09/az-supreme-court-remands-hours-of-operation-case-in-light-of-new-secondary-effects-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/10/09/az-supreme-court-remands-hours-of-operation-case-in-light-of-new-secondary-effects-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.supreme.state.az.us/opin/pdf2008/CR070429PR.pdf"><em>Arizona v. Stummer</em></a>, No. CR-07-0429-PR, 2008 WL 4501937 (Ariz. October 9, 2008)</strong>

<strong>Arizona Supreme Court remands hours of operation case for futher fact-finding in light of a newly articulated "secondary effects" test.</strong>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/10/09/az-supreme-court-remands-hours-of-operation-case-in-light-of-new-secondary-effects-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona Appellate Court holds that internet &#8220;cache&#8221; can establish &#8220;knowing possession&#8221; and &#8220;control&#8221; of child pornography</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/01/15/arizona-appellate-court-holds-that-internet-cache-can-establish-knowing-possession-and-control-of-child-pornography/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/01/15/arizona-appellate-court-holds-that-internet-cache-can-establish-knowing-possession-and-control-of-child-pornography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cofad1.state.az.us/opinionfiles/CR/CR06-0376.pdf"><em>State of Arizona v. Michael Jensen</em></a>, No. CR2004-020949-001 DT, 217 Ariz. 345 (Ariz. App. Div. 1, January 15, 2008)

Images automatically saved to a hard drive in the course of defendant's search for child pornography were sufficient to sustain his conviction for "knowingly possessing" and "controlling" child pornography.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/01/15/arizona-appellate-court-holds-that-internet-cache-can-establish-knowing-possession-and-control-of-child-pornography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 1998: Kansas City, Missouri Adult Use Study Parts 1-4</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1998/03/01/kansas-city-mo-adult-use-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1998/03/01/kansas-city-mo-adult-use-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 1998 20:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects: Quality of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adult Use Study</a>: <a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mokansascity1.pdf">Part 1: Analysis of Ordinances of Twenty Other Local Governments</a>, <a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mokansascity2.pdf">Part 2: Field Survey and Analysis of Businesses</a>, <a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mokansascity3.pdf">Part 3: Results of Neighborhood Surveys</a>, <a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mokansascity4.pdf">Part 4: Concluding Policy Analysis and Recommendations</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1998/03/01/kansas-city-mo-adult-use-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

