<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; State: Connecticut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/state-connecticut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 17:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Conn. federal court upholds Milford&#8217;s SOB ordinance, except license posting requirement that requires licensee&#8217;s name</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2013/04/01/conn-federal-court-upholds-milfords-sob-ordinance-except-license-posting-requirement-that-requires-licensees-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2013/04/01/conn-federal-court-upholds-milfords-sob-ordinance-except-license-posting-requirement-that-requires-licensees-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 21:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Keepers v. City of Milford Connecticut]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/20130401.pdf"> Keepers, Inc. v. City of Milford, Conn.</a>, Civ. No. 3:07-CV-1231 (D. Conn. Mar. 30, 2013) . . . ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2013/04/01/conn-federal-court-upholds-milfords-sob-ordinance-except-license-posting-requirement-that-requires-licensees-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit upholds &#8220;adult oriented&#8221; definition as applied to store with 12% &#8220;adult item&#8221; inventory</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/25/2nd-circuit-upholds-adult-oriented-definition-as-applied-to-store-with-12-adult-item-inventory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/25/2nd-circuit-upholds-adult-oriented-definition-as-applied-to-store-with-12-adult-item-inventory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 2nd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Connecticut]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/23959bb1-78f8-4462-bf9a-1d40a9ff44fe/1/doc/09-2950-cv_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/23959bb1-78f8-4462-bf9a-1d40a9ff44fe/1/hilite/"><em>VIP of Berlin v. Town of Berlin</em></a>, No. 09-2950-cv (2nd Cir. Jan. 25, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/25/2nd-circuit-upholds-adult-oriented-definition-as-applied-to-store-with-12-adult-item-inventory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips for Successfully Regulating Sexually Oriented Businesses</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/01/01/tips-for-successfully-regulating-sexually-oriented-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/01/01/tips-for-successfully-regulating-sexually-oriented-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Utah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1185863">Probate &#038; Property</a>: "This article reviews the current legal rules and techniques for a balanced and successful legal regime for regulating sexually oriented businesses."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/01/01/tips-for-successfully-regulating-sexually-oriented-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>October 2004: Study of Police Activity in Milford, Connecticut: Testing for Negative Secondary Effects of Adult Businesses</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/10/01/milford-ct-study-of-police-activity-testing-for-negative-secondary-effects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/10/01/milford-ct-study-of-police-activity-testing-for-negative-secondary-effects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 18:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Daniel Linz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="">Study of Police Activity in Milford</a>: "In order to test the foundational assumption that the city of Milford may regulate adult businesses because they are associated with negative secondary effects, an empirical study of criminal activity surrounding adult businesses in Milford was undertaken."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/10/01/milford-ct-study-of-police-activity-testing-for-negative-secondary-effects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
