<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; State: Delaware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/state-delaware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:58:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>According to Delaware law, &#8220;proper unit of prosecution&#8221; is per image</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/25/according-to-delaware-law-proper-unit-of-prosecution-is-per-image/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/25/according-to-delaware-law-proper-unit-of-prosecution-is-per-image/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 22:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Units of Prosecution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fink v. Phelps</em>, No. 06-181-GMS, 2010 WL 2104233 (D. Del. May 25, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/25/according-to-delaware-law-proper-unit-of-prosecution-is-per-image/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3rd Circuit Upholds 10-Year Internet Ban in Child Porn Case</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/04/3rd-circuit-upholds-10-year-internet-ban-in-child-porn-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/04/3rd-circuit-upholds-10-year-internet-ban-in-child-porn-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 3rd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man who was indicted as the leader of a child pornography ring in Delaware has lost an appeal that challenged both his 20-year prison term and a ban on using the Internet for another decade after he is released . . . But the decision in <em><a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/082335p.pdf">United States v. Thielemann</a></em> [No. 08-2335] . . . helps define . . . how far judges can go in crafting the 'conditions of release' . . . "]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/04/3rd-circuit-upholds-10-year-internet-ban-in-child-porn-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
