<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; State: Indiana</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/state-indiana/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IN: Crime to surreptitiously videotape one&#8217;s fiancee naked?</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/10/29/in-crime-to-surreptitiously-videotape-ones-fiancee-naked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/10/29/in-crime-to-surreptitiously-videotape-ones-fiancee-naked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography Production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ai.org/judiciary/opinions/pdf/10291003ewn.pdf"><em>Chiszar v. Indiana</em></a>, No. No. 91A04-1004-CR-290 (Ind. App. Oct. 29, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/10/29/in-crime-to-surreptitiously-videotape-ones-fiancee-naked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7th Circuit: SOB crime study does not support hours-of-operation ordinance</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/10/01/7th-circuit-sob-crime-study-does-not-support-hours-of-operation-ordinance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/10/01/7th-circuit-sob-crime-study-does-not-support-hours-of-operation-ordinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 19:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 7th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Richard McCleary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Annex Books v. City of Indianapolis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/tmp/1K0W4VCD.pdf"><em>Annex Books v. City of Indianapolis</em></a>, No. 09-4156 (7th Cir. Oct. 1, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/10/01/7th-circuit-sob-crime-study-does-not-support-hours-of-operation-ordinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>S.D. Ind. preliminary injunction denied where regulation not likely to decrease secondary effects</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/02/s-d-ind-preliminary-injunction-denied-where-regulation-not-likely-to-decrease-secondary-effects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/02/s-d-ind-preliminary-injunction-denied-where-regulation-not-likely-to-decrease-secondary-effects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Annex Books Inc v City of Indianapolis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cases/20091202.pdf"><em>Annex Books, Inc. v. City of Indianapoli</em>s</a>, No. 1:03-cv-918-SEB-TAB, 2009 WL 4639715 (S.D. Ind. Dec. 2, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/02/s-d-ind-preliminary-injunction-denied-where-regulation-not-likely-to-decrease-secondary-effects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FBI nabs &#8216;Boy Lovers&#8217; child-porn ring</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/23/fbi-nabs-boy-lovers-child-porn-ring/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/23/fbi-nabs-boy-lovers-child-porn-ring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The FBI today announced child-pornography charges against four men from Illinois, Wisconsin and Indiana, accusing them of operating a ring that distributed pornographic images and videos and referred to themselves by the name 'Boy Lovers.'"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/23/fbi-nabs-boy-lovers-child-porn-ring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.: The Naked Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/21/barnes-v-glen-theatre-inc-the-naked-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/21/barnes-v-glen-theatre-inc-the-naked-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kathleen T. Gibson, 9 U. Miami Ent. &#38; Sports L.Rev. 201 (2009)<br />
"In Barnes, the issue before the Court was whether the application of an Indiana public indecency statute to nude dancing impermissibly infringed upon freedom of speech. "
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/21/barnes-v-glen-theatre-inc-the-naked-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7th Circuit upholds child pornography convictions, declines to review &#8220;confusing&#8221; jury instruction</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/04/7th-circuit-upholds-child-pornography-convictions-declines-to-review-confusing-jury-instruction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/04/7th-circuit-upholds-child-pornography-convictions-declines-to-review-confusing-jury-instruction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 7th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/cases/20090904.pdf"><em>U.S. v. Noel</em></a>, No. 07-2468 (7th Cir. Sept. 4, 2009)</strong>

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/04/7th-circuit-upholds-child-pornography-convictions-declines-to-review-confusing-jury-instruction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indiana Court of Appeals: Denial of SOB alcohol license is &#8220;arbitary and capricious&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/09/30/indiana-court-of-appeals-denial-of-sob-alcohol-license-is-arbitary-and-capricious/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/09/30/indiana-court-of-appeals-denial-of-sob-alcohol-license-is-arbitary-and-capricious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/09300801nhv.pdf"><em>Indiana Alcohol &#38; Tobacco Com'n v. Ultimate Place, LLC</em></a>, 894 N.E.2d 1107 (Ind. App. September 30th, 2008)</strong>

<strong>Denial of alcohol license to Indiana sex shop is "arbitrary and capricious."</strong>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/09/30/indiana-court-of-appeals-denial-of-sob-alcohol-license-is-arbitary-and-capricious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SOB may not be grandfathered if renovations took place prior to issuance of permit</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2007/12/13/sob-may-not-be-grandfathered-if-renovations-took-place-prior-to-issuance-of-permit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2007/12/13/sob-may-not-be-grandfathered-if-renovations-took-place-prior-to-issuance-of-permit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Nonconforming Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cases/20071213.pdf"><em>Plaza Group Properties, LLC v. Spencer County Plan Com'n</em></a>, 877 N.E.2d 877 (Ind.App., Dec. 13, 2007)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2007/12/13/sob-may-not-be-grandfathered-if-renovations-took-place-prior-to-issuance-of-permit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 1998: Kansas City, Missouri Adult Use Study Parts 1-4</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1998/03/01/kansas-city-mo-adult-use-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1998/03/01/kansas-city-mo-adult-use-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 1998 20:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects: Quality of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adult Use Study</a>: <a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mokansascity1.pdf">Part 1: Analysis of Ordinances of Twenty Other Local Governments</a>, <a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mokansascity2.pdf">Part 2: Field Survey and Analysis of Businesses</a>, <a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mokansascity3.pdf">Part 3: Results of Neighborhood Surveys</a>, <a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mokansascity4.pdf">Part 4: Concluding Policy Analysis and Recommendations</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1998/03/01/kansas-city-mo-adult-use-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 1996: Newport News, Virginia Department of Planning and Development Adult Uses Report</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1996/03/01/newport-news-va-adult-use-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1996/03/01/newport-news-va-adult-use-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1996 22:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Law Enforcement Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/html/vanewportnews.html">Adult Use Study</a>: "This report identifies the need for an ordinance that would regulate Adult Uses in Newport News. Research in other cities on the impact of adult uses found that crime rates were higher and property values lower near adult uses. This report summarizes the findings of that research."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1996/03/01/newport-news-va-adult-use-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

