<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; State: Kentucky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/state-kentucky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit upholds $3,000 SOB licensing fee</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/11/23/6th-circuit-upholds-3000-sob-licensing-fee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/11/23/6th-circuit-upholds-3000-sob-licensing-fee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kentucky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/10a0738n-06.pdf"><em>729, Inc. v. Kenton County Fiscal Court</em></a>, No. 09-6291 (6th Cir. Nov. 23, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/11/23/6th-circuit-upholds-3000-sob-licensing-fee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit: Knowledge of a minor&#8217;s age is not an element of the federal offense of producing child pornography and defendant is not entitled to a mistake-of-age defense</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/06/11/6th-circuit-knowledge-of-a-minors-age-is-not-an-element-of-the-federal-offense-of-producing-child-pornography-and-defendant-is-not-entitled-to-a-mistake-of-age-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/06/11/6th-circuit-knowledge-of-a-minors-age-is-not-an-element-of-the-federal-offense-of-producing-child-pornography-and-defendant-is-not-entitled-to-a-mistake-of-age-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Mistake of Age Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: US v. Humphrey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/10a0170p-06.pdf"><em>U.S. v. Humphrey</em></a><strong>, Nos. 08-5850/5867, 608 F.3d 955 (6th Cir. June 11, 2010 )]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/06/11/6th-circuit-knowledge-of-a-minors-age-is-not-an-element-of-the-federal-offense-of-producing-child-pornography-and-defendant-is-not-entitled-to-a-mistake-of-age-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KY: Supreme Court upholds Louisville sexually oriented business ordinance</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/22/ky-supreme-court-upholds-louisville-sexually-oriented-business-ordinance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/22/ky-supreme-court-upholds-louisville-sexually-oriented-business-ordinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Distance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kentucky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://citizenlinkblog.com/drivethru/2010/04/louisville-slugger/">CitizenLink, DriveThru</a>: "The  Supreme Court of Kentucky handed the city of Louisville a huge gift today when it decided in favor of an extensive sexually oriented business ordinance passed by the Metro Council in 2004. All but one provision was held to be constitutional."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/22/ky-supreme-court-upholds-louisville-sexually-oriented-business-ordinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KY Supreme Court strikes county &#8220;no touch&#8221; provision on overbreadth grounds</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/22/ky-supreme-court-strikes-county-no-touch-provision-on-overbreadth-grounds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/22/ky-supreme-court-strikes-county-no-touch-provision-on-overbreadth-grounds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): No-Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kentucky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://opinions.kycourts.net/sc/2007-SC-000812-DG.pdf"><em>Blue Movies, Inc., et. al. v. Louisville/Jefferson  City Metro Gov’t</em></a>, 2007-SC-000812-DG (Ky. April 22, 2010)

Supreme Court of Kentucky upholds most of Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government SOB ordinance, but strikes overbroad "no-touch" provision.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/22/ky-supreme-court-strikes-county-no-touch-provision-on-overbreadth-grounds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E.D. Kentucky: $3,000 sexually oriented business annual licensing fee may survive First Amendment scrutiny</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/24/e-d-kentucky-3000-sexually-oriented-business-annual-licensing-fee-survives-first-amendment-scrutiny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/24/e-d-kentucky-3000-sexually-oriented-business-annual-licensing-fee-survives-first-amendment-scrutiny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: 729 Inc v Kenton County Fiscal Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cases/2009092401.pdf">729, Inc., et. al. v. Kenton County Fiscal Court</a></em>, No. 04-212-DOB (E.D. Ky., Sept. 24, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/24/e-d-kentucky-3000-sexually-oriented-business-annual-licensing-fee-survives-first-amendment-scrutiny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips for Successfully Regulating Sexually Oriented Businesses</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/01/01/tips-for-successfully-regulating-sexually-oriented-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/01/01/tips-for-successfully-regulating-sexually-oriented-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Utah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1185863">Probate &#038; Property</a>: "This article reviews the current legal rules and techniques for a balanced and successful legal regime for regulating sexually oriented businesses."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/01/01/tips-for-successfully-regulating-sexually-oriented-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 1998: Kansas City, Missouri Adult Use Study Parts 1-4</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1998/03/01/kansas-city-mo-adult-use-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1998/03/01/kansas-city-mo-adult-use-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 1998 20:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects: Quality of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adult Use Study</a>: <a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mokansascity1.pdf">Part 1: Analysis of Ordinances of Twenty Other Local Governments</a>, <a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mokansascity2.pdf">Part 2: Field Survey and Analysis of Businesses</a>, <a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mokansascity3.pdf">Part 3: Results of Neighborhood Surveys</a>, <a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mokansascity4.pdf">Part 4: Concluding Policy Analysis and Recommendations</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1998/03/01/kansas-city-mo-adult-use-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

