<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; State: Maine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/state-maine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Maine federal court denies restitution in child pornography case, holds that crime of possession is not a &#8220;proximate cause&#8221; of a &#8220;specific loss&#8221; on the part of the victims</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/26/maine-federal-court-denies-restitution-in-child-pornography-case-holds-that-crime-of-possession-is-not-a-proximate-cause-of-a-specific-loss-on-the-part-of-the-victims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/26/maine-federal-court-denies-restitution-in-child-pornography-case-holds-that-crime-of-possession-is-not-a-proximate-cause-of-a-specific-loss-on-the-part-of-the-victims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><a href="http://www.med.uscourts.gov/opinions/singal/2009/gzs_10262009_2-08cr212_united_states_v_michael_berk.pdf">U.S. v. Berk</a></em>, No. 08-CR-212-P-S, 2009 WL 3451085 (D. Me. Oct. 26, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/26/maine-federal-court-denies-restitution-in-child-pornography-case-holds-that-crime-of-possession-is-not-a-proximate-cause-of-a-specific-loss-on-the-part-of-the-victims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

