<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; State: Maryland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/state-maryland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>4th Circuit Finds Maryland Strip Club Law Overbroad</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/02/17/4th-circuit-finds-maryland-strip-club-law-overbroad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/02/17/4th-circuit-finds-maryland-strip-club-law-overbroad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 4th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Legend Night Club v. Miller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["In <em><a href="http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/091540.P.pdf">Legend Night Club v. Miller</a></em>, [No. 09-1540] the panel majority affirmed a permanent injunction against enforcement of the law that was imposed in 2009 by a federal district court . . . "]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/02/17/4th-circuit-finds-maryland-strip-club-law-overbroad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Md. University System to Adopt Rules Governing Use of Pornographic Movies</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/07/md-university-system-to-adopt-rules-governing-use-of-pornographic-movies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/07/md-university-system-to-adopt-rules-governing-use-of-pornographic-movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: University Policies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Maryland's state university system will be the first in the nation to adopt rules governing the acceptable use of pornographic movies on campus, under orders from state legislators who objected to the screening of [an "adult film"] at the University of Maryland last spring."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/07/md-university-system-to-adopt-rules-governing-use-of-pornographic-movies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maryland students oppose porn policy</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/07/maryland-students-oppose-porn-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/07/maryland-students-oppose-porn-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: University Policies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Students at Maryland's public universities are raising free speech concerns over a mandate that regents enact a pornographic film policy, various groups say."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/07/maryland-students-oppose-porn-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal judge strikes down Maryland county&#8217;s SOB ordinance for violation of Equal Protection Clause</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/04/02/federal-judge-strikes-down-maryland-countys-sob-ordinance-for-violation-of-equal-protection-clause/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/04/02/federal-judge-strikes-down-maryland-countys-sob-ordinance-for-violation-of-equal-protection-clause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Ordinances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Maryland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Legend Night Club v. Prince George’s County Board of Commissioners, No. MJG-05-2138 (D. Md. April 2, 2009), Judge Marvin J. Garbis struck down a sexually oriented business ordinance in Prince George’s County, Maryland.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/04/02/federal-judge-strikes-down-maryland-countys-sob-ordinance-for-violation-of-equal-protection-clause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4th Circuit: Constitution does not mandate percentage of SOB acreage</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2001/06/01/4th-circuit-constitution-does-not-mandate-percentage-of-sob-acreage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2001/06/01/4th-circuit-constitution-does-not-mandate-percentage-of-sob-acreage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2001 20:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 4th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Maryland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/001921.U.pdf"><em>Allno Enterprises, Inc. v. Baltimore Co., Maryland</em></a>, 10 Fed. Appx. 197, 2001 WL 589423 (4th Cir. 2001)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2001/06/01/4th-circuit-constitution-does-not-mandate-percentage-of-sob-acreage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

