<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; State: Nevada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/state-nevada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>9th Circuit: Possession is lesser-included offense of receipt</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/14/9th-circuit-possession-is-lesser-included-offense-of-receipt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/14/9th-circuit-possession-is-lesser-included-offense-of-receipt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 22:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Nevada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>U.S. v. Latham</strong></em>, No. 09-10099, 2010 WL 1936279 (9th Cir. May 14, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/14/9th-circuit-possession-is-lesser-included-offense-of-receipt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9th Circuit: Nevada has right to restrict brothel advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/11/9th-circuit-nevada-has-right-to-restrict-brothel-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/11/9th-circuit-nevada-has-right-to-restrict-brothel-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prostitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Trafficking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coyote Publishing, Inc. v. Miller, No. 07-16633 (9th Cir. March 11, 2010)
At issue in this case is whether Nevada's "restrictions on advertising by legal brothels" violate the First Amendment.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/11/9th-circuit-nevada-has-right-to-restrict-brothel-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Child porn bill debated in Nevada</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/05/13/child-porn-bill-debated-in-nevada/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/05/13/child-porn-bill-debated-in-nevada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Personal Injury Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.leg.state.nv.us/75th2009/Reports/history.cfm?ID=187">AB88</a> "establishes a civil remedy for a person who was a victim of a sexual offense which was used to promote child pornography."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/05/13/child-porn-bill-debated-in-nevada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 1978: Minutes on Prohibiting Sexually Oriented Businesses, Las Vegas, Nevada</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1978/03/15/las-vegas-nv-city-commision-minutes-on-prohibiting-sexually-oriented-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1978/03/15/las-vegas-nv-city-commision-minutes-on-prohibiting-sexually-oriented-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 1978 21:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Economic Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Nevada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/html/nvlasvegas.html">Minutes on Prohibiting Sexually Oriented Businesses</a>: "That is already here - Downtown and on the Strip, and every day I read in the newspapers and in the media - they are full of reports of theft – rip offs - robberies and even homicides - in these so-called "adult enterprises'."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1978/03/15/las-vegas-nv-city-commision-minutes-on-prohibiting-sexually-oriented-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

