<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; State: Ohio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/state-ohio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ohio Supreme Court mulls child-porn evidence dispute</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/09/08/ohio-supreme-court-mulls-child-porn-evidence-dispute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/09/08/ohio-supreme-court-mulls-child-porn-evidence-dispute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Search and Seizure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Warrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Ohio v. Gould]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.toledoblade.com/Courts/2011/09/08/Top-Ohio-court-mulls-child-porn-evidence-dispute.html">Toledo Blade</a>: How long can a computer hard drive be left behind before it is considered abandoned and subject to search by police without a warrant? That was the question before the Ohio Supreme Court Wednesday as it weighed the child rape, child pornography, and other convictions of Dennis Gould . . . &#124; Hat tip: <a href="http://howappealing.law.com/090811.html#042761">How Appealing</a> for providing a link to the <a href="http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/Clerk/ecms/resultsbycasenumber.asp?year=2010&#038;number=1315">documents</a>, <a href="http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/oralArguments/11/0907/0907.asp#OA101315">summary of the case</a>, and <a href="http://www.supremecourtofohiomedialibrary.org/Media.aspx?fileId=132587">video</a> of the arguments.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/09/08/ohio-supreme-court-mulls-child-porn-evidence-dispute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit upholds Ohio &#8216;no touch&#8217; strip clubs law</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/09/08/6th-circuit-upholds-ohio-no-touch-strip-clubs-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/09/08/6th-circuit-upholds-ohio-no-touch-strip-clubs-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prostitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Regulation (SOB): No-Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: 84 Video/NewsStand v. Sartini]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_STRIP_CLUBS_LAWSUIT?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2011-09-08-09-22-08">AP</a>: A federal appeals court has upheld an Ohio law that bars dancers at adult clubs from touching patrons and each other. &#124; <em><a href="http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/11a0655n-06.pdf">84 Video/NewsStand v. Sartini</a></em>, No. 09-3920 (6th Cir. Sept. 7, 2011)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/09/08/6th-circuit-upholds-ohio-no-touch-strip-clubs-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit upholds OH law prohibiting transmission of material harmful to juveniles via &#8220;personally directed electronic communications&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/15/6th-circuit-upholds-oh-law-prohibiting-transmission-of-material-harmful-to-juveniles-via-personally-directed-electronic-communications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/15/6th-circuit-upholds-oh-law-prohibiting-transmission-of-material-harmful-to-juveniles-via-personally-directed-electronic-communications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (Porn)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (Porn): Minors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Interstate Commerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><a href="http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/10a0106p-06.pdf">American  Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression v. Strickland</a></em>, Nos.  07-4375/4376 (6th Cir. Apr. 15, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/15/6th-circuit-upholds-oh-law-prohibiting-transmission-of-material-harmful-to-juveniles-via-personally-directed-electronic-communications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit: Ohio anti-porn law is constitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/15/6th-circuit-ohio-anti-porn-law-is-constitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/15/6th-circuit-ohio-anti-porn-law-is-constitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Minors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression v. Strickland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><a href="http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/10a0106p-06.pdf">American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression v. Strickland</a></em>, Nos. 07-4375/4376 (6th Cir. Apr. 15, 2010) "Ohio Revised Code § 2907.31(D)(1), which criminalizes sending juveniles material that is harmful to them . . . "]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/15/6th-circuit-ohio-anti-porn-law-is-constitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OH: Mansfield Council passes rules for sex-related businesses</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/03/oh-mansfield-council-passes-rules-for-sex-related-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/03/oh-mansfield-council-passes-rules-for-sex-related-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.mansfieldnewsjournal.com/article/20100303/NEWS01/3030311">Mansfield News Journal</a>: "Two ordinances regulating sexually oriented businesses in Mansfield were approved by council Tuesday night in a 7-1 vote."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/03/oh-mansfield-council-passes-rules-for-sex-related-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ohio Supreme Court: Law banning electronic transmission of pornography is limited to &#8220;personally directed&#8221; electronic communications</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/27/ohio-supreme-court-holds-that-law-banning-electronic-trasmission-of-pornography-is-limited-to-personally-directed-electronic-communications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/27/ohio-supreme-court-holds-that-law-banning-electronic-trasmission-of-pornography-is-limited-to-personally-directed-electronic-communications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Scienter Requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Am Bookselleers v Cordray]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-149.pdf"><em>Am. Booksellers Found. for Free Expression v. Cordray</em></a>, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-149 (Ohio Jan. 27, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/01/27/ohio-supreme-court-holds-that-law-banning-electronic-trasmission-of-pornography-is-limited-to-personally-directed-electronic-communications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OH district judge upholds no-touch, hours of operation provisions</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/06/22/oh-district-judge-upholds-no-touch-hours-of-operation-provisions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/06/22/oh-district-judge-upholds-no-touch-hours-of-operation-provisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Economic Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects: Quality of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): No-Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Daniel Linz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Richard McCleary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>84 Video/Newsstand, Inc., et al. v Thomas Sartini, et al.</em>, No. 1:07cv3190 (N.D. Ohio, June 22, 2009)

Ohio district judge upholds no-touch and hours of operation provisions against First Amendment challenges.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/06/22/oh-district-judge-upholds-no-touch-hours-of-operation-provisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit seeks guidance from OH high court on regulation of &#8220;matter harmful to minors&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/03/19/6th-circuit-seeks-guidance-from-oh-high-court-on-regulation-of-matter-harmful-to-minors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/03/19/6th-circuit-seeks-guidance-from-oh-high-court-on-regulation-of-matter-harmful-to-minors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Minors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Obscenity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In <em>Am. Booksellers Found. for Free Expression v. Strickland</em>, Nos. 07-4375/4376 (6th Cir. March 19, 2009), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit has certified, sua sponte, a number of questions regarding <a href="http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2907.31">Ohio Revised Code § 2907.31</a>(D)(1)--which prohibits the "dissemination or display of material harmful to juveniles"--to the Supreme Court of Ohio.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/03/19/6th-circuit-seeks-guidance-from-oh-high-court-on-regulation-of-matter-harmful-to-minors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ohio: May 2008 Report to the Town of Milford Planning Board by Chief of Police Thomas J. O&#8217;Loughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/05/05/milford-ohio-report-to-the-town-of-milford-planning-board/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/05/05/milford-ohio-report-to-the-town-of-milford-planning-board/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Law Enforcement Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects: Quality of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Minors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Milford Chief of Police: "In reviewing numerous studies and in my professional experience as a police official for thirty (30) years, twenty-two of which I have served as a Chief of Police in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, it is my professional opinion that there exists a number of secondary or derivative effects that emanate from Adult Entertainment Enterprises."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/05/05/milford-ohio-report-to-the-town-of-milford-planning-board/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May 2004: Methodological Critique of the Linz-Yao Report: Report to the City of Toledo, Ohio</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/05/01/toledo-oh-methodological-critique-of-the-linz-yao-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/05/01/toledo-oh-methodological-critique-of-the-linz-yao-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2004 16:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Daniel Linz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Richard McCleary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/ohio_toledo_2004.pdf">R. McCleary and J.W. Meeker</a>: "Subjected to a rigorous statistical analysis, the data demonstrate that, like sexually-oriented businesses (SOBs) in virtually every other U.S. city, Toledo’s SOBs have large, significant crime-related secondary effects."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/05/01/toledo-oh-methodological-critique-of-the-linz-yao-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

