<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; State: South Carolina</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/state-south-carolina/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SC: Federal judge strikes statute regulating &#8220;adult business&#8221; billboards</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/13/sc-federal-judge-strikes-statute-regulating-adult-business-billboards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/13/sc-federal-judge-strikes-statute-regulating-adult-business-billboards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Minors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/20090818.pdf"><em>Carolina Pride, Inc. v. McMaster</em></a>, No. 3:08-04016-CMC (D.S.C. Aug. 13, 2009): A federal judge held that "a South Carolina law limiting the placement of billboards advertising adult businesses is unconstitutional." The Sign Statute at issue, S.C. Code Ann. § 57-25-145 (enacted in 2006), "prohibits most businesses which offer sexually-oriented materials or entertainment from using any 'offpremises, outdoor advertising . . . located within one mile of a public highway.'" Grandfathered signs, such as those at issue in this case, were given until February 2009 to come into compliance with the law. Carolina Pride sued and was granted a preliminary injunction--and the government appealed.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/13/sc-federal-judge-strikes-statute-regulating-adult-business-billboards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit upholds conviction for &#8220;extraterritorial&#8221; production of child pornography</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/06/03/11th-circuit-upholds-conviction-for-extraterritorial-production-of-child-pornography/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/06/03/11th-circuit-upholds-conviction-for-extraterritorial-production-of-child-pornography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In <a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200714499.pdf"><em>U.S. v. Kapordelis</em></a>, No. 07-14499 (N.D. Ga. June 1, 2009) Gregory C. Kapordelis, an anesthesiologist, was convicted in United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia “for producing, receiving, and possessing child pornography in violation of <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00002251----000-.html">18 U.S.C. §§ 2251(a)</a>, <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00002252---A000-.html">2252A(a)(2)(A)</a>, and 2252A(a)(5)(B).” He received a 420-month sentence. On appeal to the 11th Circuit, Kapordelis disputed the affidavit for the warrant that led to his arrest, the evidence that convicted him, and the “upward departure” of his sentence. The 11th Circuit affirmed the conviction and sentence.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/06/03/11th-circuit-upholds-conviction-for-extraterritorial-production-of-child-pornography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

