<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; State: Utah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/state-utah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Judge: Utah&#8217;s Harm to Minors Internet Law is Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/05/18/federal-judge-utahs-harm-to-minors-internet-law-is-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/05/18/federal-judge-utahs-harm-to-minors-internet-law-is-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet Service Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Minors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Florence v. Shurtleff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.deseretnews.com/article/765576910/Judge-overturns-Utahs-Internet-law.html">Deseret News</a>: The Utah law sought to make website operators or content providers liable for any material that the state deems harmful to minors. &#124; Opinion: <a href="http://www.acluutah.org/Florence_Order_051612.pdf">Florence v. Shurtleff</a>, No. 2:05-cv-00485-DB-SA]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/05/18/federal-judge-utahs-harm-to-minors-internet-law-is-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utah appeals court: View &#8220;legal&#8221; pornography can be considered sentencing factor</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/07/26/utah-appeals-court-view-legal-pornography-can-be-considered-sentencing-factor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/07/26/utah-appeals-court-view-legal-pornography-can-be-considered-sentencing-factor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (Porn): Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (Porn): Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: State v. Epling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
At <a href="http://volokh.com/2011/07/25/defendants-looking-at-playboy-and-girls-gone-wild-as-sentencing-factor/#more-48818">The Volokh Conspiracy </a>, Eugene Volokh comments on a Utah sentencing ruling which holds that viewing "legal" pornography can be considered as a factor at sentencing. It seems one of the most critical factors in these cases may be the nature of the underlying offense for which the defendant is being sentenced. &#124; <a href="http://www.utcourts.gov/opinions/appopin/epling072111.pdf">State v. Epling</a>, (Utah. Ct. App. July 21, 2011)
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/07/26/utah-appeals-court-view-legal-pornography-can-be-considered-sentencing-factor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Supreme Court won&#8217;t reconsider Utah tax targeting nude bars</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/10/12/us-supreme-court-wont-reconsider-utah-tax-targeting-nude-bars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/10/12/us-supreme-court-wont-reconsider-utah-tax-targeting-nude-bars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Bushco v. Utah State Tax Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Denali LLC v. Utah State Tax Comm'n]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SUPREME_COURT_NUDIE_TAX?SITE=AP&#38;SECTION=HOME&#38;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#38;CTIME=2010-10-12-10-13-03">AP</a>: "The Supreme Court won't stop Utah from enacting a tax that hits only adult-oriented businesses." &#124; <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/denali-l-l-c-v-utah-state-tax-commission/">SCOTUS Blog Resource page</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/10/12/us-supreme-court-wont-reconsider-utah-tax-targeting-nude-bars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utah App.: Lewdness and distribution of pornography are separate offenses with different elements</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/22/utah-sc-lewdness-and-distribution-of-pornography-are-separate-offenses-with-different-elements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/22/utah-sc-lewdness-and-distribution-of-pornography-are-separate-offenses-with-different-elements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Lewdness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography Distribution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Utah v. Coble</em>, No. 20080866, 2010 WL 1617482 (Utah April 22, 2010)

For webcam offense, both lewdness and pornography distribution charges can apply.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/22/utah-sc-lewdness-and-distribution-of-pornography-are-separate-offenses-with-different-elements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips for Successfully Regulating Sexually Oriented Businesses</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/01/01/tips-for-successfully-regulating-sexually-oriented-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/01/01/tips-for-successfully-regulating-sexually-oriented-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Utah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1185863">Probate &#038; Property</a>: "This article reviews the current legal rules and techniques for a balanced and successful legal regime for regulating sexually oriented businesses."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2008/01/01/tips-for-successfully-regulating-sexually-oriented-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

