<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; State: Washington</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/state-washington/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Licensing provisions are unconstitutional where they fail to require the city to act on applications within a specified period of time</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/07/19/licensing-provisions-are-unconstitutional-where-they-fail-to-require-the-city-to-act-on-applications-within-a-specified-period-of-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/07/19/licensing-provisions-are-unconstitutional-where-they-fail-to-require-the-city-to-act-on-applications-within-a-specified-period-of-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>ATL Corp. v. City of Seattle</em>, No. C09-1240RSL, 2010 WL 2836164 (D. Wash. July 19, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/07/19/licensing-provisions-are-unconstitutional-where-they-fail-to-require-the-city-to-act-on-applications-within-a-specified-period-of-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WA Supreme Court: Libraries can block internet porn</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/06/wa-supreme-court-libraries-can-block-internet-porn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/06/wa-supreme-court-libraries-can-block-internet-porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 22:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Libraries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/index.cfm?fa=opinions.showOpinion&#38;filename=822000MAJ"><em>Bradburn v. N. Cent. Reg'l Library Dist.</em></a>, No. 82200-0 (Wash. May 6, 2010)

Library's internet filtering policy is neither prior restraint on free speech nor impermissible content-based restriction on speech.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/06/wa-supreme-court-libraries-can-block-internet-porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WA: Oak Harbor moves to regulate nude dancing</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/03/wa-oak-harbor-moves-to-regulate-nude-dancing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/03/wa-oak-harbor-moves-to-regulate-nude-dancing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.seattlepi.com/sound/416138_sound86043522.html">Seattle Post-Intelligencer</a>: "The Governmental Services Committee will review the ordinance in draft form Monday, March 9 at 8 a.m. in the City Hall Conference Room, 865 SE Barrington Dr., before it goes to the full council later this month."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/03/wa-oak-harbor-moves-to-regulate-nude-dancing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WA: Protestors want crackdown on &#8220;nearly nude baristas&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/07/wa-protestors-want-crackdown-on-nearly-nude-baristas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/07/wa-protestors-want-crackdown-on-nearly-nude-baristas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Live Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prostitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["People angry over nearly nude baristas at some Snohomish County espresso stands promised action during a heated town hall meeting Tuesday night, demanding a stronger response from police and politicians."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/07/wa-protestors-want-crackdown-on-nearly-nude-baristas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington: Bikini-clad baristas charged with prostitution</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/25/washington-bikini-clad-baristas-charged-with-prostitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/25/washington-bikini-clad-baristas-charged-with-prostitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Articles: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prostitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Five bikini-clad baristas in Everett, Wash., face prostitution charges after police said that they served up more than just hot coffee at an espresso stand, Q13FOX.com reported. The five women, employed by Everett's 'Grab-N-Go' espresso stand, have been charged with prostitution and violating the city's Adult Entertainment ordinance, Sergeant Robert Goetz told Q13 FOX News."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/25/washington-bikini-clad-baristas-charged-with-prostitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal judge rules that police arrests following SOB violations did not restrain &#8220;free speech&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/04/24/federal-judge-rules-that-police-arrests-following-sob-violations-did-not-restrain-free-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/04/24/federal-judge-rules-that-police-arrests-following-sob-violations-did-not-restrain-free-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Distance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In <em>Club 21 LLC v. City of Shoreline</em>, No. C08-0078 MJP (W.D. Wash. April 24, 2009), plaintiffs Club 21 argued that the City of Shoreline’s enforcement of its sexually oriented business ordinance “presented an unconstitutional prior restraint on free speech” because undercover officers, having “observed violations of the four foot rule,” temporarily closed the club and arrested a number of dancers and managers—thereby restraining speech.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/04/24/federal-judge-rules-that-police-arrests-following-sob-violations-did-not-restrain-free-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WA Supreme Court holds that &#8220;one count per possession&#8221; is &#8220;proper unit of prosecution&#8221; in child porn cases</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/04/09/wa-supreme-court-holds-that-one-count-per-possession-is-proper-unit-of-prosecution-in-child-porn-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/04/09/wa-supreme-court-holds-that-one-count-per-possession-is-proper-unit-of-prosecution-in-child-porn-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Units of Prosecution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In <em>Washington v. Sutherby</em>, No. 80169-0 (Wash. April 9, 2009), the Washington Supreme Court—agreeing with a Court of Appeals decision—held that “the proper unit of prosecution” for the possession of child pornography is one. Sutherby was originally convicted in a jury trial on, among other things, 10 counts of the possession of child pornography. Investigators had found “several files containing pictures of children engaged in sexually explicit conduct.”]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/04/09/wa-supreme-court-holds-that-one-count-per-possession-is-proper-unit-of-prosecution-in-child-porn-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>February 2004: Crime risk in the vicinity of a sexually oriented business: A Report to the Centralia, Washington City Attorney&#8217;s Office</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/02/01/centralia-washington-crime-risk-in-the-vicinity-of-a-sexually-oriented-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/02/01/centralia-washington-crime-risk-in-the-vicinity-of-a-sexually-oriented-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2004 16:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Richard McCleary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/washington_centralia_2004.pdf">Richard McCleary</a>: "In sum, the data show that the City has a legitimate public safety rationale for regulating sexually-oriented businesses."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/02/01/centralia-washington-crime-risk-in-the-vicinity-of-a-sexually-oriented-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 1998: Kansas City, Missouri Adult Use Study Parts 1-4</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1998/03/01/kansas-city-mo-adult-use-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1998/03/01/kansas-city-mo-adult-use-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 1998 20:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects: Quality of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adult Use Study</a>: <a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mokansascity1.pdf">Part 1: Analysis of Ordinances of Twenty Other Local Governments</a>, <a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mokansascity2.pdf">Part 2: Field Survey and Analysis of Businesses</a>, <a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mokansascity3.pdf">Part 3: Results of Neighborhood Surveys</a>, <a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mokansascity4.pdf">Part 4: Concluding Policy Analysis and Recommendations</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1998/03/01/kansas-city-mo-adult-use-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 1989: Proposed Land Use Code Amendment for Seattle, Washington</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1989/03/01/seattle-wa-proposed-land-use-code-amendment-adult-cabarets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1989/03/01/seattle-wa-proposed-land-use-code-amendment-adult-cabarets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 1989 22:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Economic Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects: Quality of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/html/waseattle.html" target="_self">Proposed Land Use Code Amendment - Adult Cabarets</a>: "This recent increase in the establishment of adult cabarets in Seattle's neighborhood commercial areas brought about a considerable number of citizen complaints."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/1989/03/01/seattle-wa-proposed-land-use-code-amendment-adult-cabarets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

