<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; Topic: Dr. Daniel Linz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/topic-dr-daniel-linz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>7th Circuit: Secondary effects rationale based on &#8220;viewing booth&#8221; evidence does not necessarily apply to &#8220;adult bookstores&#8221; that lack &#8220;view booths&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/03/7th-circuit-secondary-effects-rationale-based-on-viewing-booth-evidence-does-not-necessarily-apply-to-adult-bookstores-that-lack-view-booths/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/03/7th-circuit-secondary-effects-rationale-based-on-viewing-booth-evidence-does-not-necessarily-apply-to-adult-bookstores-that-lack-view-booths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 7th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Daniel Linz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Live Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Annex Books Inc v City of Indianapolis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cases/20090903.pdf"><em>Annex Books, Inc. v City of Indianapolis</em></a>, No. 05-1926 (7th Cir. Sept. 3, 2009)</strong>

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/03/7th-circuit-secondary-effects-rationale-based-on-viewing-booth-evidence-does-not-necessarily-apply-to-adult-bookstores-that-lack-view-booths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OH district judge upholds no-touch, hours of operation provisions</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/06/22/oh-district-judge-upholds-no-touch-hours-of-operation-provisions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/06/22/oh-district-judge-upholds-no-touch-hours-of-operation-provisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Economic Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects: Quality of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): No-Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Daniel Linz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Richard McCleary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>84 Video/Newsstand, Inc., et al. v Thomas Sartini, et al.</em>, No. 1:07cv3190 (N.D. Ohio, June 22, 2009)

Ohio district judge upholds no-touch and hours of operation provisions against First Amendment challenges.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/06/22/oh-district-judge-upholds-no-touch-hours-of-operation-provisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May 2006: Do Peep Shows “Cause” Crime? A Response to Linz, Paul, and Yao</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2006/05/01/do-peep-shows-%e2%80%9ccause%e2%80%9d-crime-a-response-to-linz-paul-and-yao/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2006/05/01/do-peep-shows-%e2%80%9ccause%e2%80%9d-crime-a-response-to-linz-paul-and-yao/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 16:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Daniel Linz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Richard McCleary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/mccleary_do_peep_shows_cause_crime.pdf">Richard McCleary and James W. Meeker</a>: "Government regulation of adult entertainment businesses, including peep shows, must be aimed at mitigating adverse secondary effects such as crime."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2006/05/01/do-peep-shows-%e2%80%9ccause%e2%80%9d-crime-a-response-to-linz-paul-and-yao/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>October 2004: Study of Police Activity in Milford, Connecticut: Testing for Negative Secondary Effects of Adult Businesses</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/10/01/milford-ct-study-of-police-activity-testing-for-negative-secondary-effects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/10/01/milford-ct-study-of-police-activity-testing-for-negative-secondary-effects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 18:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Daniel Linz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="">Study of Police Activity in Milford</a>: "In order to test the foundational assumption that the city of Milford may regulate adult businesses because they are associated with negative secondary effects, an empirical study of criminal activity surrounding adult businesses in Milford was undertaken."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/10/01/milford-ct-study-of-police-activity-testing-for-negative-secondary-effects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May 2004: Methodological Critique of the Linz-Yao Report: Report to the City of Toledo, Ohio</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/05/01/toledo-oh-methodological-critique-of-the-linz-yao-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/05/01/toledo-oh-methodological-critique-of-the-linz-yao-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2004 16:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Daniel Linz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Richard McCleary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://communitydefense.org/cdcdocs/landuse/pdf/ohio_toledo_2004.pdf">R. McCleary and J.W. Meeker</a>: "Subjected to a rigorous statistical analysis, the data demonstrate that, like sexually-oriented businesses (SOBs) in virtually every other U.S. city, Toledo’s SOBs have large, significant crime-related secondary effects."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/05/01/toledo-oh-methodological-critique-of-the-linz-yao-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April 2004: Evaluating Potential Secondary Effects of Adult Cabarets in Daytona Beach, FL: A Study of Calls for Service to the Police in Reference to Ordinance 02-496</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/04/07/daytona-beach-fl-evaluating-potential-secondary-effects-of-adult-cabarets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/04/07/daytona-beach-fl-evaluating-potential-secondary-effects-of-adult-cabarets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2004 18:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Law Enforcement Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Studies: Sexually Oriented Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects: Quality of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Daniel Linz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="">Evaluating Potential Secondary Effects of Adult Cabarets</a>: "The social disorganization variables and especially the presence of an alcohol beverage retail sale establishments in the blocks accounts largely for this explanatory power. The presence of an adult cabaret in the census block accounted for an insubstantial amount of explanatory power."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2004/04/07/daytona-beach-fl-evaluating-potential-secondary-effects-of-adult-cabarets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

