<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; Topic: File Sharing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/topic-file-sharing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>E.D. Mo.: Connection between IP and physical address sufficient for probable cause</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/10/e-d-mo-connection-between-ip-and-physical-address-sufficient-for-probable-cause/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/10/e-d-mo-connection-between-ip-and-physical-address-sufficient-for-probable-cause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: File Sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Probable Cause]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cases/20091110.pdf">U.S. v. Massey</a>, No. 4:09CR506-DJS, 2009 WL 3762322 (E.D. Mo. Nov. 10, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/11/10/e-d-mo-connection-between-ip-and-physical-address-sufficient-for-probable-cause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5th Circuit: Trial court does not abuse discretion in allowing video excerpts in child porn cases</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/26/5th-circuit-trial-court-does-not-abuse-discretion-in-allowing-video-excerpts-in-child-porn-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/26/5th-circuit-trial-court-does-not-abuse-discretion-in-allowing-video-excerpts-in-child-porn-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 5th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Evidence Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: File Sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Interstate Commerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>U.S. v. Caldwell</em>, No. 08-50804, 2009 WL 3425074 (5th Cir., Oct. 26, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/26/5th-circuit-trial-court-does-not-abuse-discretion-in-allowing-video-excerpts-in-child-porn-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit: No &#8220;reasonable expectation of privacy&#8221; in use of file sharing programs to trade child pornography</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/14/8th-circuit-no-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-use-of-file-sharing-programs-to-trade-child-pornography/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/14/8th-circuit-no-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-use-of-file-sharing-programs-to-trade-child-pornography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: File Sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/09/08/083183P.pdf"><em>USA v. Stults</em></a>, No. 08-3183 (8th Cir., Aug. 14, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/08/14/8th-circuit-no-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-use-of-file-sharing-programs-to-trade-child-pornography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

