<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; Topic: Internet Service Providers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/topic-internet-service-providers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Judge: Utah&#8217;s Harm to Minors Internet Law is Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/05/18/federal-judge-utahs-harm-to-minors-internet-law-is-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/05/18/federal-judge-utahs-harm-to-minors-internet-law-is-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet Service Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Minors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Florence v. Shurtleff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.deseretnews.com/article/765576910/Judge-overturns-Utahs-Internet-law.html">Deseret News</a>: The Utah law sought to make website operators or content providers liable for any material that the state deems harmful to minors. &#124; Opinion: <a href="http://www.acluutah.org/Florence_Order_051612.pdf">Florence v. Shurtleff</a>, No. 2:05-cv-00485-DB-SA]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/05/18/federal-judge-utahs-harm-to-minors-internet-law-is-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4th Circuit: Yahoo, ISP &#8220;subscriber information&#8221; subpoenas do not violate 4th Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/05/4th-circuit-yahoo-isp-subscriber-information-subpoenas-do-not-violate-4th-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/05/4th-circuit-yahoo-isp-subscriber-information-subpoenas-do-not-violate-4th-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 22:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 4th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet Service Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography Possession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/084207.P.pdf"><em>U.S. v. Bynum</em></a>, No. 08-4207, 604 F.3d 161 (4th Cir. May 5, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/05/4th-circuit-yahoo-isp-subscriber-information-subpoenas-do-not-violate-4th-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Court clarifies role of ISPs in child pornography cases</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/03/ny-court-clarifies-role-of-isps-in-child-pornography-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/03/ny-court-clarifies-role-of-isps-in-child-pornography-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Center for Missing and Exploited Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet Service Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: People v Eames]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cases/20100203.pdf"><em>People v. Eames</em></a>, 3274/2009, Supreme Court, New York County (Feb. 3, 2010)

Internet Service Providers are not "arm of law enforcement" when they forward detected child pornography to National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/03/ny-court-clarifies-role-of-isps-in-child-pornography-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

