<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; Topic: Interstate Commerce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/topic-interstate-commerce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit upholds OH law prohibiting transmission of material harmful to juveniles via &#8220;personally directed electronic communications&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/15/6th-circuit-upholds-oh-law-prohibiting-transmission-of-material-harmful-to-juveniles-via-personally-directed-electronic-communications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/15/6th-circuit-upholds-oh-law-prohibiting-transmission-of-material-harmful-to-juveniles-via-personally-directed-electronic-communications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (Porn)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (Porn): Minors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Interstate Commerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><a href="http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/10a0106p-06.pdf">American  Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression v. Strickland</a></em>, Nos.  07-4375/4376 (6th Cir. Apr. 15, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/15/6th-circuit-upholds-oh-law-prohibiting-transmission-of-material-harmful-to-juveniles-via-personally-directed-electronic-communications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit: Homemade child pornography does not fall outside purview of congressional legislative power</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/08/6th-circuit-homemade-child-pornography-does-not-fall-outside-purview-of-congressional-legislative-power/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/08/6th-circuit-homemade-child-pornography-does-not-fall-outside-purview-of-congressional-legislative-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Interstate Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Gonzales v Raich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: US v Bowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: US v Corp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/10a0029p-06.pdf"><em>U.S. v. Bowers</em></a>, No. 08-2412, (6th Cir. Feb. 8, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/08/6th-circuit-homemade-child-pornography-does-not-fall-outside-purview-of-congressional-legislative-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit: &#8220;Travelled in interstate commerce&#8221; means &#8220;crossed state lines&#8221; in child porn prosecution and mistake of age defense was properly precluded</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/29/8th-circuit-travelled-in-interstate-commerce-means-crossed-state-lines-in-child-porn-prosecution-and-mistake-of-age-defense-properly-precluded/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/29/8th-circuit-travelled-in-interstate-commerce-means-crossed-state-lines-in-child-porn-prosecution-and-mistake-of-age-defense-properly-precluded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Interstate Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Mistake of Age Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: US v McCloud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/09/12/091520P.pdf"><em>U.S. v. McCloud</em></a>, No. 09-1520, 2009 WL 5092941 (8th Cir. Dec. 29, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/29/8th-circuit-travelled-in-interstate-commerce-means-crossed-state-lines-in-child-porn-prosecution-and-mistake-of-age-defense-properly-precluded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5th Circuit: Trial court does not abuse discretion in allowing video excerpts in child porn cases</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/26/5th-circuit-trial-court-does-not-abuse-discretion-in-allowing-video-excerpts-in-child-porn-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/26/5th-circuit-trial-court-does-not-abuse-discretion-in-allowing-video-excerpts-in-child-porn-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 5th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Evidence Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: File Sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Interstate Commerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>U.S. v. Caldwell</em>, No. 08-50804, 2009 WL 3425074 (5th Cir., Oct. 26, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/10/26/5th-circuit-trial-court-does-not-abuse-discretion-in-allowing-video-excerpts-in-child-porn-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

