<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; Topic: Nudity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/topic-nudity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NJ appeals court upholds topless woman&#8217;s arrest to uphold important public moral sensibilities</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/09/14/nj-appeals-court-upholds-topless-womans-arrest-to-uphold-important-public-moral-sensibilities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/09/14/nj-appeals-court-upholds-topless-womans-arrest-to-uphold-important-public-moral-sensibilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 23:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: New Jersey v. Feeley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/AP94cb6dd437504ea5824636434f1ea833.html">WSJ.com</a>: The court dismissed her argument that the town's public nudity ordinance discriminated against women because men are permitted to appear topless. The court says "restrictions on the exposure of the female breast are supported by the important governmental interest in safeguarding the public's moral sensibilities." &#124; <a href="http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a0115-10.pdf"><em>New Jersey v. Feeley</em></a>, A-0115-10T3 (N.J. App. Sept. 14, 2011)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/09/14/nj-appeals-court-upholds-topless-womans-arrest-to-uphold-important-public-moral-sensibilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High court to review TV decency</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/08/26/high-court-to-review-tv-decency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/08/26/high-court-to-review-tv-decency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 21:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Indecency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nudity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1418534">One News Now</a>: The U.S. Supreme Court is preparing to hear two cases involving broadcast indecency. One case deals with foul language aired during the January 2003 broadcast of the Golden Globe Awards, and the second concerns nudity. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/08/26/high-court-to-review-tv-decency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8th Circuit: A special condition of supervised released prohibiting possession of all materials containing nudity is stricken on overbreadth grounds</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/07/21/8th-circuit-a-special-condition-of-supervised-released-prohibiting-possession-of-all-materials-containing-nudity-is-stricken-on-overbreadth-grounds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/07/21/8th-circuit-a-special-condition-of-supervised-released-prohibiting-possession-of-all-materials-containing-nudity-is-stricken-on-overbreadth-grounds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sentencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: U.S. v. Simons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/2010072101.pdf"><em>U.S. v. Simons</em></a>, No. 09-2142 (8th Cir. July 21, 2010)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/07/21/8th-circuit-a-special-condition-of-supervised-released-prohibiting-possession-of-all-materials-containing-nudity-is-stricken-on-overbreadth-grounds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

