<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; Topic: Parental Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/topic-parental-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>3rd Circuit: Prosecutor’s offer of leniency to teens for sexting is unconstitutional retaliation</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/17/3rd-circuit-prosecutor%e2%80%99s-offer-of-leniency-to-teens-for-sexting-is-unconstitutional-retaliation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/17/3rd-circuit-prosecutor%e2%80%99s-offer-of-leniency-to-teens-for-sexting-is-unconstitutional-retaliation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 3rd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sexting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/092144p.pdf"><em>Miller v. Mitchell</em></a>, No. 09-2144 (3rd Cir.  March 17, 2010)?

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/17/3rd-circuit-prosecutor%e2%80%99s-offer-of-leniency-to-teens-for-sexting-is-unconstitutional-retaliation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Review: Internet Child Protection Registry Acts: Protecting Children, Parents and . . . Pornographers? Allowing States to Balance the First Amendment with Parents&#8217; Rights to Privacy and Sovereignty in the Home</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/18/law-review-internet-child-protection-registry-acts-protecting-children-parents-and-pornographers-allowing-states-to-balance-the-first-amendment-with-parents-rights-to-privacy-and-sovereign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/18/law-review-internet-child-protection-registry-acts-protecting-children-parents-and-pornographers-allowing-states-to-balance-the-first-amendment-with-parents-rights-to-privacy-and-sovereign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Internet Child Protection Registry Acts: Protecting Children, Parents and . . . Pornographers? Allowing States to Balance the First Amendment with Parents' Rights to Privacy and Sovereignty in the Home</em>
Samuel D. Castor, 59 Cath. U. L. Rev. 231 (2009)

"This Comment evaluates states' role in the tug-of-war between governments attempting to help parents protect children from unwanted, and potentially harmful, electronic communications and the First Amendment, which prohibits Congress from abridging a person's freedom of speech."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/18/law-review-internet-child-protection-registry-acts-protecting-children-parents-and-pornographers-allowing-states-to-balance-the-first-amendment-with-parents-rights-to-privacy-and-sovereign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

