<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; Topic: Pornography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/topic-pornography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:15:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Vast Majority Of Homemade Porn, Private Photos End Up Online</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/10/23/study-vast-majority-of-homemade-porn-private-photos-end-up-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/10/23/study-vast-majority-of-homemade-porn-private-photos-end-up-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studies: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/10/23/study-vast-majority-of-homemade-porn-private-photos-end-up-online/">CBS</a>: The vast majority of homemade pornography and private images on personal computers ends up on public websites called “parasites.”
Eighty-eight percent of homemade pornography, including videos and still images, finds its way onto porn sites, often without the owners’ knowledge, a new study from Britain’s Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) has found. &#124; Internet Watch Foundation <a href="http://www.iwf.org.uk/about-iwf/news/post/334-young-people-are-warned-they-may-lose-control-over-their-images-and-videos-once-they-are-uploaded-online">press release</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/10/23/study-vast-majority-of-homemade-porn-private-photos-end-up-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5th Circuit reinstates stiff sanctions against lawyer in porn copyright troll suit</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/07/12/5th-circuit-reinstates-stiff-sanctions-against-lawyer-in-porn-copyright-troll-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/07/12/5th-circuit-reinstates-stiff-sanctions-against-lawyer-in-porn-copyright-troll-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 5th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tags: Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Mick Haig Productions v. Does 1-670]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although Mick Haig had obtained their Internet Protocol (“IP”) addresses and the names of their internet service providers (“ISPs”), it knew no other information about those 670 persons. Mick Haig sued them as John Doe defendants (“the Does”), alleging copyright infringement. Mick Haig then sought permission to expedite discovery in order to subpoena the Does’ ISPs to disclose their names and contact information before the required Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) discovery conference . . . ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/07/12/5th-circuit-reinstates-stiff-sanctions-against-lawyer-in-porn-copyright-troll-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas Court of Criminal Appeals refuses to hear ban on photographing people without their consent for sexual purposes</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/03/29/texas-court-of-criminal-appeals-refuses-to-hear-ban-on-photographing-people-without-their-consent-for-sexual-purposes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/03/29/texas-court-of-criminal-appeals-refuses-to-hear-ban-on-photographing-people-without-their-consent-for-sexual-purposes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Ex parte Nyabwa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/txstatutes/PE/5/21/21.15">Texas Penal Code § 21.15(b)(1)</a> makes it a crime to photograph someone “without the person’s consent” and “with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person.” . . .  a Texas appellate court upheld the statute . . . Today, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals refused to review . . . ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/03/29/texas-court-of-criminal-appeals-refuses-to-hear-ban-on-photographing-people-without-their-consent-for-sexual-purposes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11th Circuit asked to reinstate $19.6 million award against Hustler</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/01/26/11th-circuit-asked-to-reinstate-19-6-million-award-against-hustler/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/01/26/11th-circuit-asked-to-reinstate-19-6-million-award-against-hustler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Toffoloni v. LFP Publishing Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/11th-circuit-asked-to-reinstate-19-6-million-award-against-hustler">First Amendment Center</a>: The <a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200816148.pdf" target="_blank">11<sup>th</sup> U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled</a> in June 2009 that a notorious death doesn’t give publishers a blank check to publish any images they wish. The case went to trial, and a jury in June 2011 voted to slap <em>Hustler Magazine</em> with $19.6 million in punitive damages for running the photos.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/01/26/11th-circuit-asked-to-reinstate-19-6-million-award-against-hustler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E.D. Penn. refuses to stop Catholic Group from protesting sex superstore</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/11/01/e-d-penn-refuses-to-stop-catholic-group-from-protesting-sex-superstore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/11/01/e-d-penn-refuses-to-stop-catholic-group-from-protesting-sex-superstore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Routes 202 and 306 and Novelities and Gifts v. The Kings Men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/10/31/41078.htm">CourtHouse News</a>:  A sex superstore in southeastern Pennsylvania can't enjoin a Catholic group from protesting outside its business, a federal judge ruled. &#124; <em>Routes 202 and 306 and Novelties and Gifts v. The Kings Men</em>, No. 2:11-cv-05822-PBT (E.D. Pa.)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/11/01/e-d-penn-refuses-to-stop-catholic-group-from-protesting-sex-superstore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas Supreme Court upholds so-called “pole tax”</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/08/26/texas-supreme-court-upholds-so-called-%e2%80%9cpole-tax%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/08/26/texas-supreme-court-upholds-so-called-%e2%80%9cpole-tax%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Combs v. Texas Entertainment Association]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lower courts had called the so-called "pole tax" an improper burden on the free expression of nude dancing and a violation of the First Amendment.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/08/26/texas-supreme-court-upholds-so-called-%e2%80%9cpole-tax%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Judge Blocks Alaskan Anti-Child-Porn Law</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/07/06/federal-judge-blocks-alaskan-anti-child-porn-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/07/06/federal-judge-blocks-alaskan-anti-child-porn-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression v. Sullivan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ A federal judge has blocked a state law meant to prevent the spread of child pornography, saying it violates the First Amendment and is too broad in its scope. U.S. District Court Judge Ralph Beistline permanently barred enforcement of Senate Bill 22 . . .  &#124; <a href="http://www.akclu.org/InTheCourts/AmBooksell.Order.GrantMSJ.2010.06.30.pdf">Order: <em>American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression v. Sullivan</em>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/07/06/federal-judge-blocks-alaskan-anti-child-porn-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
