<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; Topic: Warrants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/topic-warrants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>3rd Circuit revives suit challenging pornography record keeping requirements</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/04/17/3rd-circuit-revives-suit-challenging-pornography-record-keeping-requirements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/04/17/3rd-circuit-revives-suit-challenging-pornography-record-keeping-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 3rd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Record Keeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Warrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Free Speech Coalition v. Attorney General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2012/04_-_April/Court_revives_case_against_pornography_record-keeping_laws/">Reuters</a>: A U.S. appeals court on Monday revived a lawsuit brought by members of the adult entertainment industry which challenges federal laws requiring pornography producers to report the ages of all performers.
&#124; <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-3rd-circuit/1598907.html?DCMP=NWL-pro_3rd"> Free Speech Coalition v Attorney General</a>, No. 10-4085 (3rd Cir. April 16, 2012) (Before SCIRICA, RENDELL, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. )]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2012/04/17/3rd-circuit-revives-suit-challenging-pornography-record-keeping-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ohio Supreme Court mulls child-porn evidence dispute</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/09/08/ohio-supreme-court-mulls-child-porn-evidence-dispute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/09/08/ohio-supreme-court-mulls-child-porn-evidence-dispute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Search and Seizure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Warrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Ohio v. Gould]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.toledoblade.com/Courts/2011/09/08/Top-Ohio-court-mulls-child-porn-evidence-dispute.html">Toledo Blade</a>: How long can a computer hard drive be left behind before it is considered abandoned and subject to search by police without a warrant? That was the question before the Ohio Supreme Court Wednesday as it weighed the child rape, child pornography, and other convictions of Dennis Gould . . . &#124; Hat tip: <a href="http://howappealing.law.com/090811.html#042761">How Appealing</a> for providing a link to the <a href="http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/Clerk/ecms/resultsbycasenumber.asp?year=2010&#038;number=1315">documents</a>, <a href="http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/oralArguments/11/0907/0907.asp#OA101315">summary of the case</a>, and <a href="http://www.supremecourtofohiomedialibrary.org/Media.aspx?fileId=132587">video</a> of the arguments.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/09/08/ohio-supreme-court-mulls-child-porn-evidence-dispute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10th Circuit upholds search warrant for child possession based on two year old emails verifying purchase</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/23/10th-circuit-upholds-search-warrant-for-child-possession-based-on-two-year-old-emails-verifying-purchase/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/23/10th-circuit-upholds-search-warrant-for-child-possession-based-on-two-year-old-emails-verifying-purchase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Hoarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Warrants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/09/09-7091.pdf"><em>U.S. v. Burkhart</em></a>, No. 09-7091 (10th Cir. April 23, 2010)

Internet "on demand" availability doesn't remove incentive to hoard child porn.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/23/10th-circuit-upholds-search-warrant-for-child-possession-based-on-two-year-old-emails-verifying-purchase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3rd Circuit: Search warrant is not stale where it was based on child porn accessed four months earlier</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/20/3rd-circuit-search-warrant-is-not-stale-where-it-was-based-on-child-porn-accessed-four-months-earlier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/20/3rd-circuit-search-warrant-is-not-stale-where-it-was-based-on-child-porn-accessed-four-months-earlier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 3rd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Warrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: U.S. v. Vosburgh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/084702p.pdf"><em>U.S. v. Vosburgh</em></a>, No. 08-4702, 2010 WL 1542340 (3rd Cir. April 20, 2010)

Attempt to download, tendency to "hoard," sufficient basis for child porn warrant.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/20/3rd-circuit-search-warrant-is-not-stale-where-it-was-based-on-child-porn-accessed-four-months-earlier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

