<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; ZZ: Annex Books Inc v City of Indianapolis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/zz-annex-books-inc-v-city-of-indianapolis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>S.D. Ind. preliminary injunction denied where regulation not likely to decrease secondary effects</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/02/s-d-ind-preliminary-injunction-denied-where-regulation-not-likely-to-decrease-secondary-effects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/02/s-d-ind-preliminary-injunction-denied-where-regulation-not-likely-to-decrease-secondary-effects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Annex Books Inc v City of Indianapolis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cases/20091202.pdf"><em>Annex Books, Inc. v. City of Indianapoli</em>s</a>, No. 1:03-cv-918-SEB-TAB, 2009 WL 4639715 (S.D. Ind. Dec. 2, 2009)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/12/02/s-d-ind-preliminary-injunction-denied-where-regulation-not-likely-to-decrease-secondary-effects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7th Circuit: Secondary effects rationale based on &#8220;viewing booth&#8221; evidence does not necessarily apply to &#8220;adult bookstores&#8221; that lack &#8220;view booths&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/03/7th-circuit-secondary-effects-rationale-based-on-viewing-booth-evidence-does-not-necessarily-apply-to-adult-bookstores-that-lack-view-booths/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/03/7th-circuit-secondary-effects-rationale-based-on-viewing-booth-evidence-does-not-necessarily-apply-to-adult-bookstores-that-lack-view-booths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 7th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects (SOB): Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Dr. Daniel Linz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Live Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Annex Books Inc v City of Indianapolis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cases/20090903.pdf"><em>Annex Books, Inc. v City of Indianapolis</em></a>, No. 05-1926 (7th Cir. Sept. 3, 2009)</strong>

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2009/09/03/7th-circuit-secondary-effects-rationale-based-on-viewing-booth-evidence-does-not-necessarily-apply-to-adult-bookstores-that-lack-view-booths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

