<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; ZZ: Ashcroft v ACLU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/zz-ashcroft-v-aclu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Eleventh Circuit Rejects Ninth Circuit’s National-Standard-for-Internet-Obscenity Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/04/eleventh-circuit-rejects-ninth-circuit%e2%80%99s-national-standard-for-internet-obscenity-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/04/eleventh-circuit-rejects-ninth-circuit%e2%80%99s-national-standard-for-internet-obscenity-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Community Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Obscenity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Ashcroft v ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: US v Kilbride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: US v Little]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=1938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://volokh.com/2010/02/04/eleventh-circuit-rejects-ninth-circuits-national-standard-for-internet-obscenity-decision/">Eugene Volokh reports</a>: "<em><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/unpub/ops/200815964.pdf" target="_blank">United States v. Little</a></em> concludes that Internet obscenity distribution prosecutions may rely on the community standard of the place in which the material was distributed — which means the government can try to download the material in the most restrictive community, and prosecute the distributor there. This may well be correct, given the Court’s decision in <em>Ashcroft v. ACLU</em> (I); and the Ninth Circuit’s contrary decision in <em>U</em><em>nited States v. Kilbride</em> might well be mistaken . . . "]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/02/04/eleventh-circuit-rejects-ninth-circuit%e2%80%99s-national-standard-for-internet-obscenity-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

