<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; ZZ: New Jersey v. Feeley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/zz-new-jersey-v-feeley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NJ appeals court upholds topless woman&#8217;s arrest to uphold important public moral sensibilities</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/09/14/nj-appeals-court-upholds-topless-womans-arrest-to-uphold-important-public-moral-sensibilities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/09/14/nj-appeals-court-upholds-topless-womans-arrest-to-uphold-important-public-moral-sensibilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 23:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: New Jersey v. Feeley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/AP94cb6dd437504ea5824636434f1ea833.html">WSJ.com</a>: The court dismissed her argument that the town's public nudity ordinance discriminated against women because men are permitted to appear topless. The court says "restrictions on the exposure of the female breast are supported by the important governmental interest in safeguarding the public's moral sensibilities." &#124; <a href="http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a0115-10.pdf"><em>New Jersey v. Feeley</em></a>, A-0115-10T3 (N.J. App. Sept. 14, 2011)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2011/09/14/nj-appeals-court-upholds-topless-womans-arrest-to-uphold-important-public-moral-sensibilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

