<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; ZZ: TJS of New York v Town of Smithtown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/zz-tjs-of-new-york-v-town-of-smithtown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Law Review: Alternatives for Adult Uses Required When Town is Sued</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/26/law-review-alternatives-for-adult-uses-required-when-town-is-sued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/26/law-review-alternatives-for-adult-uses-required-when-town-is-sued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 22:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Legal Periodicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Alternative Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: TJS of New York v Town of Smithtown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Alternatives for Adult Uses Required When Town is Sued</em>
Anthony S. Guardino, 5/26/2010 N.Y.L.J. 5, (col. 2)

"The particular issue in TJS was whether the constitutionality of a zoning ordinance should only be evaluated with regard to the ‘alternative avenues of communication‘ the ordinance left open at the time it was passed, or those it left open at the time it was challenged."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/05/26/law-review-alternatives-for-adult-uses-required-when-town-is-sued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit: Courts must consider &#8220;adequacy of alternative sites&#8221; at time of challenge to SOB ordinance</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/10/2nd-circuit-courts-must-consider-adequacy-of-alternative-sites-at-time-of-challenge-to-sob-ordinance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/10/2nd-circuit-courts-must-consider-adequacy-of-alternative-sites-at-time-of-challenge-to-sob-ordinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Alternative Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation (SOB): Zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: TJS of New York v Town of Smithtown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.communitydefense.org/cases/20100310.pdf"><em>TJS of New York, Inc. v. Town of Smithtown</em></a>, No. 08-2789-cv (2nd Cir. March 10, 2010)

2nd Circuit: When evaluating First Amendment challenges to a zoning ordinance, a court must consider the adequacy of alternatives at the time the ordinance is challenged.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/03/10/2nd-circuit-courts-must-consider-adequacy-of-alternative-sites-at-time-of-challenge-to-sob-ordinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

