<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community Defense Counsel &#187; ZZ: U.S. v. Vosburgh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/tag/zz-u-s-v-vosburgh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Protecting Children and Their Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>3rd Circuit: Search warrant is not stale where it was based on child porn accessed four months earlier</title>
		<link>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/20/3rd-circuit-search-warrant-is-not-stale-where-it-was-based-on-child-porn-accessed-four-months-earlier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/20/3rd-circuit-search-warrant-is-not-stale-where-it-was-based-on-child-porn-accessed-four-months-earlier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Case Abstracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 3rd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Warrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: U.S. v. Vosburgh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/?p=2222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/084702p.pdf"><em>U.S. v. Vosburgh</em></a>, No. 08-4702, 2010 WL 1542340 (3rd Cir. April 20, 2010)

Attempt to download, tendency to "hoard," sufficient basis for child porn warrant.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.communitydefense.org/wordpress/2010/04/20/3rd-circuit-search-warrant-is-not-stale-where-it-was-based-on-child-porn-accessed-four-months-earlier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

